Skip to content

Navigation Menu

About

  • Mission and Vision
  • Leadership
  • History
  • Fort Leonard Wood Historic Tour
  • FLW Command Policies and Memorandums of Instruction
  • Fort Leonard Wood Regulations
  • About the Region Video
  • Explore the FLW Region

My Fort Leonard Wood

Visitors Access
Training Information
Graduation Information
Newcomers Information
eGuidon News
Hunting and Fishing
Fort Leonard Wood MWR
Bruce C. Clarke Library
Sexual Harassment Assault Response Prevention (SHARP)
Military Equal Opportunity
Voter Assistance
Army Community Services
Army Emergency Relief (AER)

Contact

  • Crisis Phone Numbers
  • Phone Directory
  • Office of the Inspector General
  • MWR Calendar
  • Feedback (ICE)
  • Public Affairs Office
  • MSCoE Publications
    • Writer's Guide & Submission Guidelines
    • Protection Professional Bulletin
    • Protection Proponent
    • Army Chemical Review
    • CBRN Commandants Corner
    • Engineer Professional Bulletin
    • Military Police Professional Bulletin
      • Leadership Knowledge: Filling the Jar with Trust
      • Detention Operations in Large-Scale Combat Operations Against Near-Peer Threats
      • The Contested Support Area Closing the Corps’ Rear-Security Gap
      • Surviving Detention: Reforming the Army’s Detention Model for Large-Scale Combat Operations
      • The Army Corrections Command: Professionalism, Justice, and Strategic Risk Mitigation
      • Chief, Military Police Corps Regiment, and Commandant, U.S. Army Military Police School
      • The Army Corrections Command: Professionalism, Justice, and Strategic Risk Mitigation
      • Military Police Survivability in LSCO: Rebuilding the Military Police Corps for the Modern Battlefield
      • Logistics in Paradise: An MP Logisticians Experience in the Pacific
      • Protecting Army Power Projection Integrating sUAS into Police Operations
      • Training Management
      • From Competition to Command Post: Developing Operationally Adroit MP NCOs
      • Redefining the Role of Military Police Commanders in Large-Scale Combat Operations (LSCO)
      • Command and Control Challenges for Enabler Units in the Transition to Mobile Brigade Combat Teams
      • Military Police Must Reevaluate PME to Prepare for LSCO and our Role in Protection
      • Unchecking the Block: Addressing the "Check-the-Box" Mindset in Army Training
      • Why the Army Should Keep the Master Resilience Training Program
      • Surveillance and Sustainment at the Southern Border Mission: Implementation of the G-BOSS(E) and Lessons Learned for Large- Scale Combat Operations
      • Preparing Reserve Officers for MPCCC Success | MSCOE
      • Guardians of the Community: Modernize the Military Police Regiment
      • Austere Challenge 24: Lessons Learned from the 97th Military Police Battalion in WFX 24-03
      • Active Shooter Training in LEA Environments
      • Strengthening Partnerships for National Security: Insights from the Provost Marshal Office, U.S. Army Military District of Washington, DOD and Interagency Breakfast
      • Building Trust and Fostering Innovation Through Army Leadership: Insight from ADP 6-22
      • The Importance of Interoperability in Military Police Law Enforcement
      • 716th Military Police Battalion: The Future of Air Assault Military Police
      • Lessons Learned at JRTC: A Look Into 194th Military Police Company Preparation and Execution
      • Pacific Prowess: Adapting Military Police Capabilities for the Indo-Pacific
      • Using UASs to Bridge the Military Police ISR GAP
      • The Role of the Law Enforcement Tactics Branch in Enabling Protection During Crisis
      • Enabling Protection Through Social Media
      • Leading From Within
      • Preventing Terrorist Attacks Through Community Policing
      • Enabling Protection During a Crisis: The Role of the MSCoE NCOA
      • Vanguard: History of the 972d Military Police Company
      • Maryland's Finest Protection Force
      • A New Chapter: The Transformation of the 508th Military Police Battalion
      • Enabling Protection During Crisis
      • Operation Pathways: A Framework for Creating Protected Sustainment in the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command
      • Enhanced Combat Support During the Vietnam War (26 September 1966–25 July 1970)
      • Combat Support Enablement of Protection Security and Mobility Operations
      • What's Old Becomes New: Reviving "Obsolete" Doctrine for Multidomain Operations and Beyond
      • Lineage and Honors—89th Military Police Brigade
      • Military Police 2024
      • Enabling Protection During a Crisis: The Role of the MSCoE NCOA
      • Military Police 2024
      • The Future of the MWD Program: LSCO Integration and Holistic Health and Wellness
      • Regimental Chief Warrant Officer
      • Chief, Military Police Corps Regiment, and Commandant, U.S. Army Military Police School
      • Regimental Command Sergeant Major
      • Farewell from Brigadier General Sarah K. Albrycht
      • Community Policing at Fort Eisenhower
      • Using UASs to Bridge the Military Police ISR GAP 2
      • Strengthening International Cooperation: 709th Military Police Battalion Participation in a German Bridging and Gap-Crossing Operations Course
      • Restoring Warrior Skills: Reintegrating Traditional Sergeant's Time Training
      • Enhancing Communications and Interoperability in the NCR
      • Military Police are Here, Now What? Observations and Perspective as a Military Police OC/T at NTC
      • Military Police Contributions to the Future of the Protection WFF: Evolving to Enable Formation-Based Layered Protection
      • The SGM-A Fellowship Program Role in Preparing the Army of 2040
      • Military Police Platoons of 2040
      • The Future of The Military Police Platoon
      • Military Police in the Year 2040
      • The Future Battlefield: Increased Capabilities and Threats
      • Change of Mission: A Military Police Platoon in 2040
      • The Military Police Platoon of 2040
      • Military Police Operations in 2040
      • An Imagined Military Police Platoon in 2040
      • MP=Multipurpose
      • Decoding an Unknown Environment with Military Police Corps Technology
      • Emerging Military Police Platoon Assets and Capabilities
      • The War in Ukraine: How the JSA has impacted Units in the European Theater
      • Operation Assure, deter, and Reinforce: Lessons Learned From A Company Commander's Perspective
      • Earning The Title of First Sergeant
      • Urban Reconnaissance Through Supervised Autonomy
      • More Than Just Military Police
      • Global Engagement With Partner and Allied Military Police
      • JARVISS
      • Training to Win With Interoperability
      • Is There Ever a Crisis in Doctrine?
      • Overcoming Obstacles: reflections on Teamwork
      • Military Police Doctrine Corner
      • Military Police Archives
    • Military Police Commandants Corner
  • U.S. Army Counterintelligence Command

Units / Tenants

  • U.S. Army Engineer School
  • U.S. Army CBRN School
  • U.S. Army Military Police School
  • 102nd Training Division
  • MSCoE Noncommissioned Officer's Academy
  • 43rd AG Reception Battalion
  • 5th Engineer Battalion
  • 58th Transportation Battalion
  • 763D EOD
  • Homeland Defense Civil Support Office
  • Geospatial Enterprise Office
  • General Leonard Wood Army Community Hospital
  • U.S. Air Force
  • Marine Corps Detachment
  • Navy Detachment
  • U.S. Army Prime Power School

Search

Home U.S. Army home page
Army.mil
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood

Home of the Maneuver Support Center of Excellence.


  1. Home
  2. Contact
  3. MSCoE Publications
  4. Military Police Professional Bulletin
  5. The Army Corrections Command: Professionalism, Justice, and Strategic Risk Mitigation

The Army Corrections Command: Professionalism, Justice, and Strategic Risk Mitigation

The Army Corrections Command

Professionalism, Justice, and Strategic Risk

By Captain Joshua I. Bogle and Staff Sergeant Caitlin E. Sias

Corrections and detention operations have been integral to the U.S. military since 1776, during both peace and war. Headquarters, Department of the Army established the Army Corrections Command (ACC) to exercise command and control over all Army correctional facilities. The ACC is responsible for confining and rehabilitating military personnel convicted at courts-martial while ensuring discipline, security, and the fair administration of justice within the military justice system. The Army Corrections Brigade (ACB), Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, is the home of military corrections and represents the largest subordinate unit of the ACC. The ACB maintains command and control of the United States Disciplinary Barracks and the Midwest Joint Regional Correctional Facility, managing more than 685 inmates around the clock.

The ACB exemplifies expertise in high-risk close confinement and contributes globally to correctional practices. Military corrections enforce both federal and military laws under the Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ),[1] reflecting the military’s commitment to recruit individuals of strong moral character and reform those who violate laws. The ACB plays a vital role in the military justice system, ensuring that offenders face consequences while being rehabilitated and deterred from reoffending.

The highly trained personnel of the ACB support commanders and their staffs in planning and executing detention efforts across all military scenarios. The ACB provides advisors to U.S. Army National Guard and Army Reserve units during mobilization and deployments. In conflict zones, correctional experts work with allied forces to manage detainees from capture to detention facilities, freeing combat units from detainee operations. Military police detention efforts aid stability by turning the challenge of interning combatants into an opportunity for reintegration as informed, productive citizens.

Ultimately, the ACB mitigates strategic risk for the U.S. Army and the Department of Defense (DOD) by providing correctional expertise in high-risk close confinement, serving as the culmination of the military justice system and providing advice and assistance to support the active-duty component through detention operations in large-scale combat operations.

Harnessing Talent and Experience in High-Risk Close Confinement

Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 31E–Corrections and Detention Specialists undergo 7 weeks of Basic Training and Advanced Individual Training before participating in further skill development at correctional facilities. Upon assignment, they complete a rigorous, two-part training program: a week-long preservice course and 5 days of immersive on-the-job training. These programs equip Soldiers with essential skills such as security protocols, inmate management, and emergency response, fostering decision making and confidence.

Detainee Operations Training

Detainee operations training
Detainee operations training

The ACC excels in handling high-risk inmates in close confinement, such as those housed in the special housing unit, where specialized skills are required. Soldiers selected for special housing unit duty complete a multiphase training regimen, including a 2-day certification and on-the-job training focused on operations, communication, and the identification of high-risk behaviors. This ensures that ACC personnel are prepared to handle complex situations in demanding environments. Behavioral health staff further enhance the capabilities of the ACC by addressing the psychological needs of inmates, managing those prone to violence, and aiding their rehabilitation. These efforts support transitions from a special housing unit to the general population, society, or military service.

Culminating the Military Justice System

Correctional facilities are crucial to the justice system, where sentences are enforced while offenders are rehabilitated to reenter society. Corrections personnel follow court rulings, ensuring that punishment is carried out and public safety is upheld.[2] Correctional rehabilitation programs (such as education, job training, and therapy) prepare inmates for successful reintegration into society, with the goal of reducing recidivism. Parole hearings and sentence modifications involve corrections professionals, whose reports influence decisions about release.

This commitment to rehabilitation and reintegration extends beyond the walls of confinement. If an offender is granted supervision or parole, the Army Corrections System (ACS) continues to regularly monitor them upon their release through electronic tracking, drug testing, and other methods. During this time, the ACS coordinates with law enforcement agencies to assist in monitoring high-risk offenders and respond to violations of parole conditions. Parole violators are reincarcerated to serve out the remainder of their sentence along with any additional time imposed by the courts for reimprisonment offenses. To ensure that inmates fulfill their confinement obligations, the inmate administrators within the ACC recalculate release dates to account for lost good conduct time, earned time, or special acts of abatement.[3]

Linking Corrections and Detention Operations

Corrections and detention operations involve the confinement and management of individuals, but they differ in their scope and legal foundations. The ACS focuses on safely and securely incarcerating and rehabilitating U.S. military prisoners and protecting the community through deterrence.[4] In contrast, military detention operations typically occur within a warzone and involve individuals captured during combat or deemed a security threat. These operations are governed by international law, including the Geneva Conventions, which dictate humane treatment and the handling of detainees. Two relevant examples of U.S. military detention operations include those at Andersonville Prison, also known as Camp Sumter, a Confederate prison camp during the American Civil War located in Andersonville, Georgia, and at Abu Ghraib prison, a prison complex located 20 miles west of Baghdad, Iraq, used during the Iraq War.

Andersonville Prison
Andersonville Prison

Andersonville Prison

Historical examples highlight the need for trained personnel and codified systems in detention. During the Civil War, prisoners at Andersonville Prison suffered horrific conditions caused by an untrained guard force, insufficient logistical support, and overcrowded facilities. Designed for 10,000 prisoners, it swelled to over three times its capacity within 6 months, leading to disease outbreaks and malnutrition. By the end of the war, more than 13,000 prisoners died from poor sanitation, overcrowding, exposure to disease, freezing temperatures, and hunger.[5]

Operational challenges at Andersonville Prison were mirrored at Abu Ghraib after the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq. Reports in November 2003 revealed multiple cases of abuse, including torture, sexual violence, and detainee deaths caused by military police Soldiers from the 800th Military Police Brigade, Uniondale, New York.[6] Inadequate training in prisoner handling procedures, a limited understanding of Geneva Convention provisions, and Soldier quality-of-life issues—driven by logistical constraints of the broader conflict—produced an environment conducive to prisoner abuse.[7] These incidents underscore the critical role of trained correctional specialists in minimizing risks during detainee operations.

As operations shift between counterinsurgency and large-scale combat operations, the United States must address adversaries across space, cyberspace, air, maritime, and land domains in addition to the physical, information, and human dimensions.[8] Units must train to safeguard and transfer detainees as the battlefield evolves. Large-scale combat operations pose sustainment challenges in securing resources for construction materials, medical support, and mortuary affairs for temporary and permanent detainee facilities, requiring innovative logistical solutions.

Detention operations support the operational tenets of agility, convergence, and endurance. Agility is achieved by quickly collapsing and relocating detainee collection points to adapt to the evolving battlefield. Convergence ensures that detainee operations synchronize with battlefield progress, advancing detainee collection points alongside the forward line of troops to support combat by processing captured enemy detainees.[9]

Mitigating Strategic Risk

Corrections operations are regulated by Army Regulation (AR) 190-47[10] and Department of Defense Instruction Number (DODI) 1325.07,[11] which govern the ACS. The ACS complies with the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003, which establishes national standards for prison rape prevention and response.[12] Additionally, the ACS adheres to accreditation standards set forth by the American Correctional Association. Per AR 190-47, the ACS protects communities by incarcerating U.S. military prisoners; providing safe, secure environments; and fostering rehabilitation through programs, administrative reviews, parole supervision, and sex offender registration.

The National Defense Strategy directs DOD efforts to mitigate strategic risks. Specifically, the 2022 National Defense Strategy emphasizes defending the homeland, deterring strategic attacks, and building a resilient joint force.[13] It warns that internal issues can undermine mission cohesion and success.[14] The ACB and ACC reduce strategic risk by managing corrections and detention operations for the DOD.

Aligned with the National Defense Strategy priorities, the ACB continuously conducts corrections operations, maintaining custody and discipline under the UCMJ. The ACC ensures safe and humane incarceration worldwide while preparing prisoners for reintegration into society or the armed forces. These efforts uphold the law, deter offenses, and protect national security by safeguarding sensitive information and preventing radicalization in civilian prisons. Correctional facilities enhance force readiness by rehabilitating prisoners to become productive citizens. The ACC also provides professional corrections experts to commanders, ensuring humane detainee treatment on battlefields, reinforcing national values, and strengthening public trust in the military.

In conclusion, skilled correction and detention professionals are essential to military corrections at home and detainee operations abroad. As the final stage of the military justice system, the ACC plays a critical role in deterring indiscipline and criminal activity. The expertise gained in ACC facilities, combined with specialized training, enables Corrections Specialists to effectively advise commanders on detention operations. As a result, the ACC reduces strategic risk and reinforces its relevance in the modern military framework.Military Police Watermark Logo

About the Authors

Captain Joshua I. Bogle is the commander of Headquarters Company, Midwest Joint Regional Correctional Facility Battalion (Corrections), Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. He holds a bachelor’s degree in defense and strategic studies from the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, and a master’s degree in criminal justice administration from Columbia College, Missouri.

Staff Sergeant Caitlin E. Sias is the battalion physical security inspector for Headquarters Company, Midwest Joint Regional Correctional Facility Battalion (Corrections). She holds an associate’s degree in liberal arts from Upper Iowa University, Fayette; a bachelor’s degree in project management from The University of Arizona Global Campus; and a master’s degree in business administration from Webster University.

Endnotes:

  1. AR 27-10, Military Justice, 8 January 2025. ↩
  2. Doris L. MacKenzie, “From Theory to Policy: Evidence-Based Corrections,” in Introduction to Criminal Justice: A Sociological Perspective, 2013, Stanford University Press, p. 5-6. ↩
  3. AR 190-47, The Army Corrections System, 17 March 2023, p. 53. ↩
  4. Ibid, p. 3. ↩
  5. “History of the Andersonville Prison,” National Park Service website, https://www.nps.gov/ande/learn/historyculture/camp_sumter_history.htm, accessed on 2 June 2025. ↩
  6. Thomas O’Dea, “Andersonville: Prisoner of War Camp,” National Park Service website, https://www.nps.gov/articles/andersonville-prisoner-of-war-camp-teaching-with-historic-places.htm, accessed on 2 June 2025. ↩
  7. Paul T. Bartone, “Lessons of Abu Ghraib: Understanding and Preventing Prisoner Abuse in Military Operations,” Defense Horizons, 1 November 2008, p. 1-8. ↩
  8. Field Manual (FM) 3-0, Operations, 1 October 2022, p. X. ↩
  9. Ibid, p. 3-2. ↩
  10. AR 190-47, The Army Corrections System, 17 March 2023. ↩
  11. DODI 1325.07, Administration of Military Correctional Facilities and Clemency and Parole Authority, 11 March 2023. ↩
  12. Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003, Public Law 108-79, 108th Congress, 45 United States Code §§ 15601-15609, 2003. ↩
  13. United States Department of Defense, 2022 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Including the 2022 Nuclear Posture Review and the 2022 Missile Defense Review, 2022, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1183514.pdf, accessed on 9 June 2025. ↩
  14. Ibid. ↩

Disclaimer 1: The contents of this article do not represent the official views of, nor are they endorsed by, the U.S. Army, the Department of War, or the U.S. government.

Download Original PDF Document
Published August 15, 2025

 

 

 

Share this page:

Army.mil

Army.mil


Employment

FOIA

Terms of Use

Accessibility/Section 508

Ready Army


Need Help? Try Army A-Z

My Army Benefits

Warriors Wanted Videos

Page Last Modified: 8/11/26, 12:34 PM

Army CID Submit a Tip / Report a Crime Logo

ManeuverSptCtrOfExce_nobackground.fw.png

Fort Leonard Wood

Victory Through Skill


Policies and Regulations

MSCoE MEO and Garrison EEO

SHARP

Provide Feedback

Webmaster

PRIVACY

 

 

Community Resource Guide

https://www.usainscom.army.mil/isalute/iSalute - Report suspicious activity

imcom.army.mil

U.S. ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND


"We Are the Army's Home"

FIND A GARRISON

Survivor Outreach Services | Total Army Sponsorship | Safety

Human Resources | Civilian Expeditionary Workforce

U.S. Army Environmental Command | Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy & Environment

Back to Top