Skip to content

Navigation Menu

About

  • Mission and Vision
  • Leadership
  • History
  • Fort Leonard Wood Historic Tour
  • FLW Command Policies and Memorandums of Instruction
  • Fort Leonard Wood Regulations
  • About the Region Video
  • Explore the FLW Region

My Fort Leonard Wood

Visitors Access
Training Information
Graduation Information
Newcomers Information
eGuidon News
Hunting and Fishing
Fort Leonard Wood MWR
Bruce C. Clarke Library
Sexual Harassment Assault Response Prevention (SHARP)
Military Equal Opportunity
Voter Assistance
Army Community Services
Army Emergency Relief (AER)

Contact

  • Crisis Phone Numbers
  • Phone Directory
  • Office of the Inspector General
  • MWR Calendar
  • Feedback (ICE)
  • Public Affairs Office
  • MSCoE Publications
    • Writer's Guide & Submission Guidelines
    • Protection Professional Bulletin
    • Army Chemical Review
    • Engineer Professional Bulletin
    • Military Police Professional Bulletin
      • Surveillance and Sustainment at the Southern Border Mission: Implementation of the G-BOSS(E) and Lessons Learned for Large- Scale Combat Operations
      • Protection in a Maritime Environment
      • 85th Anniversary of Military Police Corps
      • Commandant Colonel Robert R. Rodock
      • CSM James W. Rutherford
      • Leadership Knowledge: Filling the Jar with Trust
      • Detention Operations in Large-Scale Combat Operations Against Near-Peer Threats
      • The Contested Support Area Closing the Corps’ Rear-Security Gap
      • Surviving Detention: Reforming the Army’s Detention Model for Large-Scale Combat Operations
      • The Army Corrections Command: Professionalism, Justice, and Strategic Risk Mitigation
      • Chief, Military Police Corps Regiment, and Commandant, U.S. Army Military Police School
      • The Army Corrections Command: Professionalism, Justice, and Strategic Risk Mitigation
      • Military Police Survivability in LSCO: Rebuilding the Military Police Corps for the Modern Battlefield
      • Logistics in Paradise: An MP Logisticians Experience in the Pacific
      • Protecting Army Power Projection Integrating sUAS into Police Operations
      • Training Management
      • From Competition to Command Post: Developing Operationally Adroit MP NCOs
      • Redefining the Role of Military Police Commanders in Large-Scale Combat Operations (LSCO)
      • Command and Control Challenges for Enabler Units in the Transition to Mobile Brigade Combat Teams
      • Military Police Must Reevaluate PME to Prepare for LSCO and our Role in Protection
      • Unchecking the Block: Addressing the "Check-the-Box" Mindset in Army Training
      • Why the Army Should Keep the Master Resilience Training Program
      • Ready for the Resident Phases: Preparing Reserve Junior Officers for MPCCC Success
      • Guardians of the Community: Modernize the Military Police Regiment
      • Austere Challenge 24: Lessons Learned from the 97th Military Police Battalion in WFX 24-03
      • Active Shooter Training in LEA Environments
      • Strengthening Partnerships for National Security: Insights from the Provost Marshal Office, U.S. Army Military District of Washington, DOD and Interagency Breakfast
      • Building Trust and Fostering Innovation Through Army Leadership: Insight from ADP 6-22
      • The Importance of Interoperability in Military Police Law Enforcement
      • 716th Military Police Battalion: The Future of Air Assault Military Police
      • Lessons Learned at JRTC: A Look Into 194th Military Police Company Preparation and Execution
      • Pacific Prowess: Adapting Military Police Capabilities for the Indo-Pacific
      • Using UASs to Bridge the Military Police ISR GAP
      • The Role of the Law Enforcement Tactics Branch in Enabling Protection During Crisis
      • Enabling Protection Through Social Media
      • Leading From Within
      • Preventing Terrorist Attacks Through Community Policing
      • Vanguard: History of the 972d Military Police Company
      • Maryland's Finest Protection Force
      • A New Chapter: The Transformation of the 508th Military Police Battalion
      • Enabling Protection During Crisis
      • Operation Pathways: A Framework for Creating Protected Sustainment in the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command
      • Enhanced Combat Support During the Vietnam War (26 September 1966–25 July 1970)
      • Combat Support Enablement of Protection Security and Mobility Operations
      • What's Old Becomes New: Reviving "Obsolete" Doctrine for Multidomain Operations and Beyond
      • Lineage and Honors—89th Military Police Brigade
      • Military Police 2024
      • Enabling Protection During a Crisis: The Role of the MSCoE NCOA
      • Military Police 2024
      • The Future of the MWD Program: LSCO Integration and Holistic Health and Wellness
      • Regimental Chief Warrant Officer
      • Chief, Military Police Corps Regiment, and Commandant, U.S. Army Military Police School
      • Regimental Command Sergeant Major
      • Farewell from Brigadier General Sarah K. Albrycht
      • Community Policing at Fort Eisenhower
      • Strengthening International Cooperation: 709th Military Police Battalion Participation in a German Bridging and Gap-Crossing Operations Course
      • Restoring Warrior Skills: Reintegrating Traditional Sergeant's Time Training
      • Enhancing Communications and Interoperability in the NCR
      • Military Police are Here, Now What? Observations and Perspective as a Military Police OC/T at NTC
      • Military Police Contributions to the Future of the Protection WFF: Evolving to Enable Formation-Based Layered Protection
      • The SGM-A Fellowship Program Role in Preparing the Army of 2040
      • Military Police Platoons of 2040
      • The Future of The Military Police Platoon
      • Military Police in the Year 2040
      • The Future Battlefield: Increased Capabilities and Threats
      • Change of Mission: A Military Police Platoon in 2040
      • The Military Police Platoon of 2040
      • Military Police Operations in 2040
      • An Imagined Military Police Platoon in 2040
      • MP=Multipurpose
      • Decoding an Unknown Environment with Military Police Corps Technology
      • Emerging Military Police Platoon Assets and Capabilities
      • The War in Ukraine: How the JSA has impacted Units in the European Theater
      • Operation Assure, deter, and Reinforce: Lessons Learned From A Company Commander's Perspective
      • Earning The Title of First Sergeant
      • Urban Reconnaissance Through Supervised Autonomy
      • More Than Just Military Police
      • Global Engagement With Partner and Allied Military Police
      • JARVISS
      • Training to Win With Interoperability
      • Is There Ever a Crisis in Doctrine?
      • Overcoming Obstacles: Reflections on Teamwork
      • Military Police Doctrine Corner
      • Military Police Archives
  • U.S. Army Counterintelligence Command

Units / Tenants

  • U.S. Army Engineer School
  • U.S. Army CBRN School
  • U.S. Army Military Police School
  • 102nd Training Division
  • MSCoE Noncommissioned Officers Academy
  • 43rd AG Reception Battalion
  • 58th Transportation Battalion
  • 763D EOD
  • Homeland Defense Civil Support Office
  • Geospatial Enterprise Office
  • General Leonard Wood Community Hospital
  • U.S. Air Force
  • Marine Corps Detachment
  • Navy Detachment
  • U.S. Army Prime Power School

Search

Home U.S. Army home page
Army.mil
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood

Home of the Maneuver Support Center of Excellence.


NEW!   Check out the new NCO's Barracks Guidebook!
  1. Home
  2. Contact
  3. MSCoE Publications
  4. Military Police Professional Bulletin
  5. Active Shooter Training in LEA Environments

Active Shooter Training in LEA Environments

Listen to This Article
Select 'Read Article Aloud' to begin.

Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response

By First Lieutenant Spencer Tindall

The Intro

Emerging threats and technology necessitate boots on the ground to adapt training and resources to meet mission requirements while adapting to resource and manpower constraints. As the United States Northern Command operational environment evolves, a multidisciplinary approach to law enforcement is required to maintain unit readiness and operational tempo. The complexity and disposition of the Fort Gordon, Georgia law enforcement community necessitate interoperability. With limited resources and personnel, our community law enforcement must be trained and evaluated holistically and more frequently.

The Team

Fort Gordon, Georgia is home to the United States Army Cyber Center of Excellence. The installation has numerous law enforcement agencies on post, including a law enforcement activity, the Law Enforcement Center, home to the Department of the Army civilian police, Department of the Army Criminal Investigation Division Fort Gordon resident agency, Defense Health Agency security, Department of the Army Security Guards, and National Security Agency police. While each organization has a director, chief, or commander, none of those command hierarchies are synergized. In the spring of 2025, all parties came to the table to understand the mission of each adjacent unit. Simultaneously, they ensured integrated, layered, and redundant security while acknowledging each other’s challenges. This effort enabled collaboration on training objectives, allowing a perceived weakness to be a pillar of strength.

The Problem

The one-size-fits-most law enforcement activity Table of Distributions and Allowances for Training and Doctrine Command installations has resulted in potential conflict should a significant Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response event arise. The blueprint outlined for the law enforcement activities reduced the number of basic patrol Soldiers and Department of the Army civilian police authorized by both law enforcement activity and Garrison Tables of Distributions and Allowances. This leaves most Training and Doctrine Command law enforcement activities with little choice but to operate on 12-hour shifts to meet mission requirements, contrasting with the Training and Doctrine Command base order. This constrains the ability of the law enforcement activity Commander and Department of the Army civilian police Chief of Police to conduct well-resourced, realistic, and rigorous training toward collective tasks. Although creative plans have been implemented to accomplish the basic Annual Law Enforcement Compliance Program training, constraints have created an environment that simply “checks the box,” rather than preparing all law enforcement on the installation for the risks they may face.

Asher Events Explained

Direct action units conduct significant training cycles to conduct cordon and search missions. They spend countless hours over the course of a training cycle rehearsing with their organic fire team or squad. This mitigates the high-risk nature of close-quarters battle. Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response is arguably higher risk than generic close-quarters battle. Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training active shooter response level 1, the nationally recognized standard for Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response, teaches techniques for as few as two officers to clear a structure to find and neutralize an active threat. These first two officers may be a criminal investigation division agent and a local sheriff’s office school resource officer who have never met or worked together. There is no trust or shared understanding of task accomplishment. Unlike a Special Reaction Team, which trains together like a direct action unit, our patrols need far more than one classroom exposure a year to do this task. Bridging the gap with different local agencies in universally recognized training is vital to containing and shortening the duration of the incident.

Historically, at an Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response event, all local, state, and federal law enforcement officers respond to support the host law enforcement department or agency. During the Washington Naval Yard shooting, 117 officers from five agencies entered the building to search for the gunman. During the Robb Elementary School shooting, over 375 local, state, and federal law enforcement officers arrived to support the law enforcement response. Department of the Army law enforcement assets must be interoperable to support such an event. This includes being able to shoot, move, and communicate among intergovernmental agency law enforcement officer partners.

Our Solution

At Fort Gordon, Georgia, the Cyber Center of Excellence law enforcement activity is driving an integrated Fort Gordon initiative to integrate all federal, state, and local law enforcement officer partners. Cyber Center of Excellence law enforcement activity, in coordination with the local Criminal Investigation Division field office, plans and coordinates active shooter training between National Security Agency Police, Criminal Investigation Division, military police, Department of the Army civilian police, and Richmond County Sheriff’s Office. This training, facilitated by subject matter experts from Richmond County Sheriff’s Office, Criminal Investigation Division, and the military police, fosters critical communication over response tactics, techniques, and procedures for Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response events. Training is held off-post at Richmond County’s premier active shooter training site, which is a decommissioned county school. This training site facilitates fundamental close-quarters battle and Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training with sim-munitions, I-E-D simulators, foreign area debris common to schools and public spaces, reduced sight lines, low-light areas, fire alarms, and smoke. This initiative ensures that when an Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response event happens and seconds matter, our local law enforcement partners are trained to meet it as a unified force.

This joint-training initiative has led to personnel from each individual organization developing tactics, techniques, and procedures for actions on the objective during an Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response event. In March 2025, the law enforcement activity and Criminal Investigation Division hosted a weeklong training on the fundamentals of close-quarters battle training. The instruction began the walk phase of the initiative. In August 2025, Richmond County Sheriff’s Office hosted a weeklong Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response force-on-force training at their active shooter training site. This training was built on the fundamentals of close-quarters battle by introducing new stimuli and enabling cooperation among National Security Agency police, Criminal Investigation Division, Richmond County Sheriff’s Office, Department of the Army civilian police, and military police. In 2026, the law enforcement activity plans on hosting additional joint training to refine tactics, techniques, and procedures and reinforce Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response under stress.

Force-Wide Application

Fort Gordon, Georgia law enforcement officer recommends a similar approach to Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response event training at each Department of War installation, which is likely to have an interagency law enforcement response to an Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response event to overcome the limitations of force structure, mitigate risk from uncoordinated joint Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response tactics, techniques, and procedures, and increase response efficiency. We recommend that United States Military Police School seriously consider the options of making Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training instructor training a military police additional skill identifier or creating a condensed “Master Close-Quarters Battle Instructor Course” with an associated additional skill identifier. In addition, these additional skill identifiers should be added to the Table of Distributions and Allowances authorizations for each law enforcement activity. Through adaptation to emergent threats, Department of War installation integrated law enforcement teams will be ready and capable of handling an Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response event.

Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response

By First Lieutenant Spencer Tindall

The Intro

Deliberate search of the building
MPs, DACPs and NSA police begin a deliberate search of the building, without a driving force directing them to the threat.

Emerging threats and technology necessitate boots on the ground to adapt training and resources to meet mission requirements while adapting to resource and manpower constraints. As the United States Northern Command operational environment evolves, a multidisciplinary approach to law enforcement is required to maintain unit readiness and operational tempo. The complexity and disposition of the Fort Gordon, Georgia (FGGA) law enforcement (LE) community necessitate interoperability. With limited resources and personnel, our community law enforcement must be trained and evaluated holistically and more frequently.

The Team

FGGA is home to the United States Army Cyber Center of Excellence (CCoE). The installation has numerous law enforcement agencies on post, including a law enforcement activity (LEA), the Law Enforcement Center (LEC) (home to the Department of the Army civilian police [DACP]), Department of the Army Criminal Investigation Division Fort Gordon resident agency, Defense Health Agency security, Department of the Army Security Guards (DASG), and National Security Agency (NSA) police. While each organization has a director, chief, or commander, none of those command hierarchies are synergized. In the spring of 2025, all parties came to the table to understand the mission of each adjacent unit. Simultaneously, they ensured integrated, layered, and redundant security while acknowledging each other’s challenges. This effort enabled collaboration on training objectives, allowing a perceived weakness to be a pillar of strength.

The Problem

CQB instruction
A RCSO SGT instructs fundamental CQB applications to ASHER response.

The one-size-fits-most LEA Table of Distributions and Allowances for Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) installations has resulted in potential conflict should a significant Active Shooter/Hostile Event Response (ASHER) event arise. The blueprint outlined for the LEAs reduced the number of basic patrol Soldiers/DACPs authorized by both LEA and Garrison TDAs. This leaves most TRADOC LEAs with little choice but to operate on 12-hour shifts to meet mission requirements, contrasting with the TRADOC base order. This constrains the ability of the LEA Commander and DACP Chief of Police to conduct well-resourced, realistic, and rigorous training toward collective tasks. Although creative plans have been implemented to accomplish the basic Annual Law Enforcement Compliance Program (ALECP) training, constraints have created an environment that simply “checks the box,” rather than preparing all law enforcement on the installation for the risks they may face.

Asher Events Explained

Direct action units conduct significant training cycles to conduct cordon and search missions. They spend countless hours over the course of a training cycle rehearsing with their organic fire team/squad. This mitigates the high-risk nature of close-quarters battle (CQB). ASHER is arguably higher risk than generic CQB. Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training (ALERRT) active shooter response level 1 (the nationally recognized standard for ASHER) teaches techniques for as few as two officers to clear a structure to find and neutralize an active threat. These first two officers may be a criminal investigation division (CID) agent and a local sheriff’s office school resource officer who have never met or worked together. There is no trust or shared understanding of task accomplishment. Unlike a Special Reaction Team (SRT), which trains together (like a direct action unit), our patrols need far more than one classroom exposure a year to do this task. Bridging the gap with different local agencies in universally recognized training is vital to containing and shortening the duration of the incident.

Historically, at an ASHER event, all local, state, and federal law enforcement officers (LEOs) respond to support the host LE department/agency. During the Washington Naval Yard shooting, 117 officers from five agencies entered the building to search for the gunman.[1] During the Robb Elementary School shooting, over 375 local, state, and federal LEOs arrived to support the LE response.[2] Department of the Army law enforcement assets must be interoperable to support such an event. This includes being able to shoot, move, and communicate among intergovernmental agency LEO partners.

Our Solution

CQB fundamental application
CID, NSA Police and MPs apply CQB fundamentals as they move towards gun shots inside the school.

At FGGA, the CCoE LEA is driving an integrated Fort Gordon initiative to integrate all federal, state, and local LEO partners. CCoE LEA, in coordination with the local CID field office, plans and coordinates active shooter training between NSA Police, CID, Military police, DACP, and Richmond County Sheriff’s Office (RCSO). This training, facilitated by subject matter experts from RCSO, CID, and the military police, fosters critical communication over response TTPs for ASHER events. Training is held off-post at Richmond County’s premier active shooter training site, which is a decommissioned county school. This training site facilitates fundamental CQB and ALERRT training with sim-munitions, IED simulators, foreign area debris common to schools and public spaces, reduced sight lines, low-light areas, fire alarms, and smoke. This initiative ensures that when an ASHER event happens and seconds matter, our local LE partners are trained to meet it as a unified force.

This joint-training initiative has led to personnel from each individual organization developing TTPs for actions on the objective during an ASHER event. In March 2025, the LEA and CID hosted a weeklong training on the fundamentals of CQB training. The instruction began the walk phase of the initiative. In August 2025, RCSO hosted a weeklong ASHER force-on-force training at their active shooter training site. This training was built on the fundamentals of CQB by introducing new stimuli and enabling cooperation among NSA police, CID, RSCO, DACP, and military police. In 2026, the LEA plans on hosting additional joint training to refine TTPs and reinforce ASHER response under stress.

Force-Wide Application

FGGA LEO recommends a similar approach to ASHER event training at each Department of War (DoW) installation, which is likely to have an interagency LE response to an ASHER event to overcome the limitations of force structure, mitigate risk from uncoordinated joint-ASHER TTPs, and increase response efficiency. We recommend that United States Military Police School seriously consider the options of making ALERRT instructor training a military police additional skill identifier or creating a condensed “Master CQB Instructor Course” with an associated additional skill identifier. In addition, these additional skill identifiers should be added to the TDA authorizations for each LEA. Through adaptation to emergent threats, DOW installation integrated law enforcement teams will be ready and capable of handling an ASHER event.Military Police Crest

About the Author

First Lieutenant Spencer Tindall currently serves as the Executive Officer at Cyber Center of Excellence Law Enforcement Activity, Fort Gordon, Georgia. He holds a bachelor’s degree in psychology from Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah.

Endnotes:

  1. Cathy L. Lanier. 2014. MPD Navy Yard After Action Report. Washington, DC: Metropolitan Police District of Columbia. July 11. https://mpdc.dc.gov/publication/mpd-navy-yard-after-action-report. ↩
  2. Dustin Burrows, Jon Moody, and Eva Guzman. 2022. Investigative Committee on the Robb Elementary Shooting. Austin, TX: Texas House of Representatives. https://www.house.texas.gov/pdfs/committees/reports/interim/87interim/Robb-Elementary-Investigative-Committee-Report-update.pdf; Zach Despart. 2022. "’Widespread Failures’ in Uvalde Shooting Went Far Beyond Local Police, Texas House Report Details." The Texas Tribune, July 17. https://www.texastribune.org/2022/07/17/law-enforcement-failure-uvalde-shooting-investigation/. ↩

Disclaimer 1: The contents of this article do not represent the official views of, nor are they endorsed by, the U.S. Army, the Department of War, or the U.S. government.

Disclaimer 2: This article was edited with the assistance of AI tools, and subsequently reviewed and edited by relevant Department of War (DOW) personnel to ensure accuracy, clarity, and compliance with DOW policies and guidance.

Download Original PDF Document
Published January 2, 2026
Share this page:

Army.mil

Army.mil


Employment

FOIA

Terms of Use

Accessibility/Section 508

Ready Army


Need Help? Try Army A-Z

My Army Benefits

Warriors Wanted Videos

Page Last Modified: 11/5/26, 3:47 PM

Army CID Submit a Tip / Report a Crime Logo

ManeuverSptCtrOfExce_nobackground.fw.png

Fort Leonard Wood

 

Policies and Regulations

MSCoE MEO and Garrison EEO

SHARP

Provide Feedback

Webmaster

PRIVACY

 

 

Community Resource Guide

https://www.usainscom.army.mil/isalute/iSalute - Report suspicious activity

imcom.army.mil

U.S. ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND


"We Are the Army's Home"

FIND A GARRISON

Survivor Outreach Services | Total Army Sponsorship | Safety

Human Resources | Civilian Expeditionary Workforce

U.S. Army Environmental Command | Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy & Environment

Back to Top