Skip to content

Navigation Menu

About

  • Mission and Vision
  • Leadership
  • History
  • Fort Leonard Wood Historic Tour
  • FLW Command Policies and Memorandums of Instruction
  • Fort Leonard Wood Regulations
  • About the Region Video
  • Explore the FLW Region

My Fort Leonard Wood

Visitors Access
Training Information
Graduation Information
Newcomers Information
eGuidon News
Hunting and Fishing
Fort Leonard Wood MWR
Bruce C. Clarke Library
Sexual Harassment Assault Response Prevention (SHARP)
Military Equal Opportunity
Voter Assistance
Army Community Services
Army Emergency Relief (AER)

Contact

  • Crisis Phone Numbers
  • Phone Directory
  • Office of the Inspector General
  • MWR Calendar
  • Feedback (ICE)
  • Public Affairs Office
  • MSCoE Publications
    • Writer's Guide & Submission Guidelines
    • Protection Professional Bulletin
    • Protection Proponent
    • Army Chemical Review
    • CBRN Commandants Corner
    • Engineer Professional Bulletin
    • Engineer Commandants Corner
    • Military Police Professional Bulletin
      • The Army Corrections Command: Professionalism, Justice, and Strategic Risk Mitigation
      • Logistics in Paradise: An MP Logisticians Experience in the Pacific
      • Protecting Army Power Projection Integrating sUAS into Police Operations
      • Training Management
      • From Competition to Command Post: Developing Operationally Adroit MP NCOs
      • Redefining the Role of Military Police Commanders in Large-Scale Combat Operations (LSCO)
      • Command and Control Challenges for Enabler Units in the Transition to Mobile Brigade Combat Teams
      • Military Police Must Reevaluate PME to Prepare for LSCO and our Role in Protection
      • Unchecking the Block: Addressing the "Check-the-Box" Mindset in Army Training
      • Why the Army Should Keep the Master Resilience Training Program
      • Surveillance and Sustainment at the Southern Border Mission: Implementation of the G-BOSS(E) and Lessons Learned for Large- Scale Combat Operations
      • Preparing Reserve Officers for MPCCC Success | MSCOE
      • Guardians of the Community: Modernize the Military Police Regiment
      • Austere Challenge 24: Lessons Learned from the 97th Military Police Battalion in WFX 24-03
      • Active Shooter Training in LEA Environments
      • Strengthening Partnerships for National Security: Insights from the Provost Marshal Office, U.S. Army Military District of Washington, DOD and Interagency Breakfast
      • Building Trust and Fostering Innovation Through Army Leadership: Insight from ADP 6-22
      • The Importance of Interoperability in Military Police Law Enforcement
      • 716th Military Police Battalion: The Future of Air Assault Military Police
      • Lessons Learned at JRTC: A Look Into 194th Military Police Company Preparation and Execution
      • Pacific Prowess: Adapting Military Police Capabilities for the Indo-Pacific
      • Using UASs to Bridge the Military Police ISR GAP
      • The Role of the Law Enforcement Tactics Branch in Enabling Protection During Crisis
      • Enabling Protection Through Social Media
      • Leading From Within
      • Preventing Terrorist Attacks Through Community Policing
      • Enabling Protection During a Crisis: The Role of the MSCoE NCOA
      • Vanguard: History of the 972d Military Police Company
      • Maryland's Finest Protection Force
      • A New Chapter: The Transformation of the 508th Military Police Battalion
      • Enabling Protection During Crisis
      • Operation Pathways: A Framework for Creating Protected Sustainment in the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command
      • Enhanced Combat Support During the Vietnam War (26 September 1966–25 July 1970)
      • Combat Support Enablement of Protection Security and Mobility Operations
      • What's Old Becomes New: Reviving "Obsolete" Doctrine for Multidomain Operations and Beyond
      • Lineage and Honors—89th Military Police Brigade
      • Military Police 2024
      • Military Police 2024
      • Enabling Protection During a Crisis: The Role of the MSCoE NCOA
      • Military Police 2024
      • The Future of the MWD Program: LSCO Integration and Holistic Health and Wellness
      • Enhanced Combat Support During the Vietnam War (26 September 1966-25 July 1970)
      • Regimental Chief Warrant Officer
      • Chief, Military Police Corps Regiment, and Commandant, U.S. Army Military Police School
      • Regimental Command Sergeant Major
      • Farewell from Brigadier General Sarah K. Albrycht
      • Community Policing at Fort Eisenhower
      • Using UASs to Bridge the Military Police ISR GAP 2
      • Strengthening International Cooperation: 709th Military Police Battalion Participation in a German Bridging and Gap-Crossing Operations Course
      • Restoring Warrior Skills: Reintegrating Traditional Sergeant's Time Training
      • Enhancing Communications and Interoperability in the NCR
      • Military Police are Here, Now What? Observations and Perspective as a Military Police OC/T at NTC
      • Military Police Contributions to the Future of the Protection WFF: Evolving to Enable Formation-Based Layered Protection
      • Military Police 2024
      • Military Police Archives
      • Military Police Commandants Corner
    • Military Police Commandants Corner
  • U.S. Army Counterintelligence Command

Units / Tenants

  • U.S. Army Engineer School
  • U.S. Army CBRN School
  • U.S. Army Military Police School
  • 102nd Training Division
  • MSCoE Noncommissioned Officer's Academy
  • 43rd AG Reception Battalion
  • 5th Engineer Battalion
  • 58th Transportation Battalion
  • 763D EOD
  • Homeland Defense Civil Support Office
  • Geospatial Enterprise Office
  • General Leonard Wood Army Community Hospital
  • U.S. Air Force
  • Marine Corps Detachment
  • Navy Detachment
  • U.S. Army Prime Power School

Search

Home U.S. Army home page
Army.mil
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood

Home of the Maneuver Support Center of Excellence.


  1. Home
  2. Contact
  3. MSCoE Publications
  4. Military Police Professional Bulletin
  5. Protecting Army Power Projection Integrating sUAS into Police Operations

Protecting Army Power Projection Integrating sUAS into Police Operations

Protecting Army Power Projection

Integrating sUAS into Police Operations

By Major Kievell Ruffin

“Warfighting is a team effort. Soldiers, American industry, our communities, our families – every part of the team must be ready. Our installations support this effort and provide us with power projection platforms across the country and abroad.” —Secretary of the Army Daniel P. Driscoll
May 7, 2025[1]
Spc. William Ritter operating RQ-11 Raven software
Spc. William Ritter, a military policeman with 287th Military Police Company, 97th Military Police Battalion, 89th Military Police Brigade, Fort Riley, Kansas, sets up the software used to monitor and control the RQ-11 Raven, a small unmanned aerial system (sUAS), during Allied Spirit VIII at Hohenfels, Germany, Jan. 26, 2018. Roughly 4,100 troops from 10 nations are participating in Allied Spirit VIII, a multinational training exercise designed to test participants’ readiness and capabilities.

(U.S. Army photo by Spc. Dustin D. Biven / 22nd Mobile Public Affairs Detachment)

The U.S. Army’s operation doctrine describes how Army forces enable joint operations through combat power projection and by setting theaters for the joint force. Senior leaders, installation commanders, Soldiers, and Families recognize that the Army’s global response capability begins in the strategic-support area, which also contains critical operational functions essential to multidomain operations. Military police law enforcement activity (LEA) units support installation commanders by protecting capabilities that adversaries may target to delay, disrupt, or degrade the flow of forces into theaters.

The Army Transformation Initiative integrates Army operational tenets and imperatives into the police operations executed by military police LEA units. Incorporating small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) enhances military police LEA units’ ability to understand threat disposition within the strategic-support area and to establish conditions for making contact on favorable terms. To meet the demands of this initiative, military police LEA units require formation-based transformation that aligns their structure and capabilities with emerging operational requirements.

Equipping Military Police Law-Enforcement Activities with sUAS

“In competition, the Army provides the Department of Defense with foundational capabilities and the capacity to shape the environment.” —Chief of Staff of the Army General James McConville
March 16, 2021[2]
Military Police Traffic Patrol Stop
U.S. Army military police officers from the 529th Military Police Company, 709th Military Police Battalion, conduct a mid‑shift traffic patrol stop at Caserma Ederle in Vicenza, Italy, May 21, 2026, during routine security operations supporting the installation’s law‑enforcement mission.

(U.S. Army photo by Josiana Greenaway)

U.S. Army power projection begins in the strategic-support area (home-station installations), making them primary targets for adversarial disruption. Integrating commercial, budget-friendly small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) into military police law enforcement activity (LEA) units—specifically within physical security and patrol branches—provides installation commanders with an immediate, low-cost force multiplier to observe, detect, and neutralize threats with greater speed and precision while maintaining strict constitutional and regulatory compliance.

Transformation can occur relatively quickly. Military police LEA transformation is achievable in under two years by employing the Army’s Program Executive Office for Aviation (PEO Aviation)-recommended, commercially available sUAS, which provide Defense Innovation Unit-compliant and highly affordable options. PEO Aviation’s $2,000 vendor price cap ensures that units can produce low-cost, low-maintenance systems, while in-house repairs further reduce sustainment costs by eliminating vendor dependency.

Current military police doctrine already supports integrating sUAS into military police formations, enabling military police LEA units to enhance situational understanding and protect the strategic-support area. Affordable sUAS solutions and shared operational experience across military police units strengthen their ability to counter threats from foreign intelligence services, criminal networks, and violent extremists.

Equipping military police LEA units with sUAS in the next Army programming cycle will improve protection of the strategic-support area by reducing opportunities for adversaries to achieve surprise or gain unexpected advantages.

Organizing to Shape the Environment

“Equipment is not, by itself, capability.” —Commanding General of the U.S. Army Futures Command General James Rainey
August 2024[3]
sUAS training at March Air Reserve Base
Soldiers assigned to the 302nd Mobile Public Affairs Detachment (MPAD) and the 371st Combat Sustainment Support Battalion (CSSB) participate in small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) training at March Air Reserve Base, Moreno Valley, California, April 11, 2026. The training focused on identifying, reporting, and responding to aerial threats to enhance Soldier survivability and mission readiness.

(U.S. Army photo by Spc. Nathan Starr)

Preparing military police Soldiers and leaders for police operations across multiple domains builds the confidence needed to rapidly adapt to emerging technologies such as new sUAS. Military police companies already have experience employing the RQ-11 Raven in both training environments and foreign engagements, providing a foundation for broader sUAS integration. Military police LEA units can incorporate sUAS capabilities in a practical and cost-effective manner within both the force-protection section and the patrol branch.

Within the force-protection section, physical security teams can significantly improve surveillance of restrictive terrain and strengthen risk and threat analysis by deploying sUAS. These teams follow established air-tasking procedures at their installations to obtain flight-operations approval. In the patrol branch, sUAS serve as rapid-deployment assets during emergencies, enabling patrols to coordinate and converge law-enforcement responses to threats against the safety and security of the strategic-support area.

To support this capability, the patrol branch must develop clear approval authorities and procedures for emergency flight operations at Army installations. Consistent supervisor availability and accessibility are essential to ensure readiness for both planned and emergency sUAS employment.

Training for Disciplined Initiative in sUAS Operations

“Perhaps most importantly, our adversaries grow stronger every day and seek any seam to erode our advantages but also provide us with a renewed sense of purpose.” —Command General of U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command General Gary Brito
March 18, 2024[4]
sUAS training at March Air Reserve Base
Soldiers assigned to the 302nd Mobile Public Affairs Detachment (MPAD) and the 371st Combat Sustainment Support Battalion (CSSB) participate in small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) training at March Air Reserve Base, Moreno Valley, California, April 11, 2026. The training focused on identifying, reporting, and responding to aerial threats to enhance Soldier survivability and mission readiness.

(U.S. Army photo by Spc. Nathan Starr)

Military police LEA units carry the unique responsibility of securing the strategic-support area while safeguarding the privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties of the Army community. Military police Soldiers are trained to exercise disciplined initiative within the legal and police constraints of their operating environment. Building the Army community’s confidence in the responsible use of sUAS is essential to maintaining public safety and trust.

The Federal Law Enforcement Training Center offers a 10-day Law Enforcement sUAS Pilot Training Program, which provides officers with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) credentials required to operate sUAS in support of their agency’s mission. Training that includes flight operations over people and moving vehicles and during periods of darkness demonstrates the program’s significant operational value. The FAA also mandates a biennial recertification of aeronautical knowledge.

To align with these requirements, the U.S. Army Military Police Corps should adapt its complex sUAS operations training and evaluation standards to reinforce FAA compliance and ensure that military police LEA units maintain the proficiency necessary for safe, lawful, and effective employment.

Guiding sUAS Operations Through Policy

“To have a ready Army, to have an Army that the joint force needs, you need to have installations that can support that readiness.” — Commanding General of Installation Management Command Lieutenant General Omar Jones
July 28, 2025[5]
Military Police Traffic Patrol Stop
U.S. Army military police officers from the 529th Military Police Company, 709th Military Police Battalion, conduct a mid‑shift traffic patrol stop at Caserma Ederle in Vicenza, Italy, May 21, 2026, during routine security operations supporting the installation’s law‑enforcement mission.

(U.S. Army photo by Josiana Greenaway)

In sUAS operations, commanders must balance the imperative to protect Army readiness and power projection with the need to avoid unnecessary intrusions on the civil liberties and reasonable expectations of privacy of the Army’s transient population and installation residents. The following legal considerations should inform policy development for commercial off-the-shelf sUAS solutions:

  • Military Rule of Evidence 313(b) permits installation commanders to conduct administrative inspections—including examinations at installation entry and exit points—to ensure security, military fitness, and good order and discipline. These inspections may use any reasonable natural or technological aid and may occur with or without notice.
  • Hester v. United States (1924) clarified that “open fields” are not protected under the Fourth Amendment because they are not considered persons, houses, papers, or effects.
  • California v. Ciraolo (1986) determined that naked-eye observation from an aircraft lawfully operating at 1,000 feet does not constitute a Fourth Amendment search. However, the “naked-eye” limitation may restrict the technical specifications of sUAS used to discover evidence.
  • Dow Chemical Co. v. United States (1986) found that aerial photography using a commercially available camera does not constitute a Fourth Amendment search. However, the use of satellite imagery, parabolic microphones, or other high-tech devices would qualify as a search when used to gather evidence against a person.
  • New York v. Burger (1987) established three requirements for warrantless administrative inspections: the government must have a substantial interest in regulating the activity; the inspection must be necessary to further that interest; and the regulatory scheme must provide an adequate substitute for a warrant.
  • Kyllo v. United States (2001) held that when the government uses technology not in general public use to conduct surveillance, the activity constitutes a Fourth Amendment search. Without a warrant, such surveillance is presumptively unreasonable when used to discover evidence against a person. The thermal-imaging device in this case has capabilities similar to some sUAS sensors.
  • United States v. Tuggle (2021) held that persistent camera surveillance of areas in public view does not violate the Fourth Amendment. Public view includes aerial observation, particularly on military installations where overflight is authorized.
  • Alaska v. McKelvey (2024) concluded that aerial surveillance using a high-powered telephoto lens constitutes a search requiring a warrant when used to discover evidence against a person.

Protecting the Force as a Warfighting Function

Power projection is essential to the Army’s ability to support the joint force in large-scale combat operations. Adversaries will exploit any opportunity to disrupt U.S. capabilities, readiness, or intentions. Military police LEA units are the first to make physical contact with adversaries or threats at Army installations in the strategic-support area. Equipping military police LEA units with sUAS enhances their ability to observe the environment, detect threats at greater depth, and respond more rapidly and decisively.

s-UAS-enabled military police LEA units strengthen the protection of Army communities and power projection by converging on threats with greater speed and precision. The Army Transformation Initiative provides a pathway for military police LEA units to modernize police operations, and trained military police are prepared to employ sUAS effectively in the strategic-support area. Avoiding risk is not the best approach to protecting Army readiness; instead, Army law-enforcement partners worldwide have developed proven methods to reduce and mitigate the risks associated with sUAS operations.

Warfighting begins in the strategic-support area. Military police LEA units equipped with sUAS will deliver the protection required to preserve readiness and enable military operations across the strategic-support area.MP Watermark Crest

About the Author

Major Ruffin serves as the Team Chief for the Army Joint Operations Center, HQDA G-3/5/7. He holds a master’s degree in business and organizational security management from Webster University, Webster Groves, Missouri.

Endnotes:

  1. https://www.army.mil/article/285285/remarks_as_prepared_for_the_army_posture_hearing_may_7_2025 ↩
  2. https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2021/03/23/eeac3d01/20210319-csa-paper-1-signed-print-version.pdf ↩
  3. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2024-OLE/Deliberate-Transformation/ ↩
  4. https://warontherocks.com/professionalism-is-the-foundation-of-the-army-and-we-will-strengthen-it/ ↩
  5. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1n951Ntbpo ↩

Disclaimer 1: The contents of this article do not represent the official views of, nor are they endorsed by, the U.S. Army, the Department of War, or the U.S. government.

Disclaimer 2: This article was edited with the assistance of AI tools, and subsequently reviewed and edited by relevant Department of War (DOW) personnel to ensure accuracy, clarity, and compliance with DOW policies and guidance.

Download Original PDF Document
Published June 16, 2026
Share this page:

Army.mil

Army.mil


Employment

FOIA

Terms of Use

Accessibility/Section 508

Ready Army


Need Help? Try Army A-Z

My Army Benefits

Warriors Wanted Videos

Page Last Modified: 6/24/26, 1:00 PM

ManeuverSptCtrOfExce_nobackground.fw.png

Fort Leonard Wood

Victory Through Skill


Policies and Regulations

MSCoE MEO and Garrison EEO

SHARP

Provide Feedback

Webmaster

PRIVACY

 

 

Community Resource Guide

iSalute - Report suspicious activity

imcom.army.mil

U.S. ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND


"We Are the Army's Home"

FIND A GARRISON

Survivor Outreach Services | Total Army Sponsorship | Safety

Human Resources | Civilian Expeditionary Workforce

U.S. Army Environmental Command | Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy & Environment

Back to Top