Skip to content

Navigation Menu

About

  • Mission and Vision
  • Leadership
  • History
  • Fort Leonard Wood Historic Tour
  • FLW Command Policies and Memorandums of Instruction
  • Fort Leonard Wood Regulations
  • About the Region Video
  • Explore the FLW Region

My Fort Leonard Wood

Visitors Access
Training Information
Graduation Information
Newcomers Information
eGuidon News
Hunting and Fishing
Fort Leonard Wood MWR
Bruce C. Clarke Library
Sexual Harassment Assault Response Prevention (SHARP)
Military Equal Opportunity
Voter Assistance
Army Community Services
Army Emergency Relief (AER)

Contact

  • Crisis Phone Numbers
  • Phone Directory
  • Office of the Inspector General
  • MWR Calendar
  • Feedback (ICE)
  • Public Affairs Office
  • MSCoE Publications
    • Writer's Guide & Submission Guidelines
    • Protection Professional Bulletin
      • Protection and Operational Art
      • Dark and Disconnected: Can the U.S. Army Fight Without a Digital Footprint?
      • The Fight Behind the Fight: 55th MEB Prepares for Modern Battlefield
      • The Evolving Protection Against Hostile Drones
      • Friendly Force Information Requirements as Protection-Informed Decisions
      • CBRN Company Task Organization for Persistent and Nonpersistent Threat Environments
      • A Layered Approach to Active Protection
      • Targeted and Exposed: Why Command Post Survivability Demands a Paradigm Shift
      • 42nd Infantry Division Protection Cell: Breaking the Reactive Cycle
      • A New Horizon for Maneuver Support Experimentation: The Final MSPIX and a Vision for the Future
      • Commanders: A Deeper Understanding of the Protection Warfighting Function
      • Further Defining Protection Support Planning
      • Can't Measure a Negative: The Protection Warfighting Function and Large-Scale Combat Operations
      • Failure to Consider Protection in Large-Scale Combat Operations: The Siverskyi Donets River Crossing
      • Protection: The Australian Army Combat Engineer Regiment Approach
      • Fight to Protect the Force
      • Protection: The Fabric of the Warfighting Functions
      • Enabling Convergence: How Engineers Protect the Multidomain Battlespace
      • War-Gaming
      • Protection in the Modern Battlespace: A Conceptual Approach for Battalion and Brigade Staffs
      • Joint Protection Efforts
      • Protection in an Armored Division-The Iron Way
      • Maneuver Support Center of Excellence and Fort Leonard Wood Commanding General
      • Maneuver Support and Protection Integration Experiment 2024
      • Protective Fires
      • The Inaugural Protection and Maneuver Support Senior Leader Forum
      • Survivability: The Foundation of Protection
      • Aligning Protection in the Operations Process
      • Book Review: Next War: Reimagining How We Fight
      • 2025 Protection Warfighting Function Professional Media List
      • Impact of the 52d BEB Mounted CBRN R&S Platoon Throughout KRF-13
      • The Application of the U.S. Army RM Process is Broken
      • Prioritizing Protection: Creating Synchronized Success
      • 10 Tips for Improving Your Protection Working Group
      • Protection Integration in an Armored Corps Insights from WGFX 23-04
      • A Diverse Strategy for a Diverse WFF
      • ADP 3-37, Protection: An Update to the WFF
      • Protection Analysis
      • What is Protection in 2040?
      • The EOCOP and its Place in LSCO
      • The Rugged Brigade and DCRF 22: Preparing to Respond to CBRN Disasters
      • Operationalizing Risk Management for Division and Corps
      • Taming the Hydra: Working Toward an Integrated Protection Construct
      • The All-Domain Protection Story
      • The Protection Warfighting Function In Irregular Warfare
      • Multi-Domain Operations: The Latest Evolution of Operational Doctrine
      • EOD and LSCO in Doctrine
      • Where Did the IEDs Go? Thoughts on Strategic and Operational Rear Areas
      • MSSPIX 22
      • Integrating Protection Into Modern-Day Wargaming
      • CBOA 22
      • Modernization of the Protection WFF
      • You are not alone: How to engage your protection Warfighting Function Community
      • Changing Mindsets: The Necessity of Considering Protection First In future Conflicts with Peers
      • Demining in the DMZ
      • Protection Planning at Every Echelon
      • Paradigm Shift: Transforming the Protection WFF to Meet the New Peer Competitor in Multi-Domain Operations
      • Protection and the Change in the Character of War
      • Advising Foreign Security Force Engineers
      • Scaffolding the Future of Protection: Protection Training and Education
      • Power Projection Mission Assurance in the Homeland
      • Competing Through C-IED Fusion in the pacific: Developing Partners and Allies with Functional Area SFA
      • Modernizing the Forgotten Warfighting Function: Protection
      • Realizing All-Domain Protection
      • EOD in LSCO
      • The Character of Harms: Operational Challenges in Control
      • Multidomain Protection Operations in a Multicommand Environment
      • Protection Archives
      • Protection Doctrine Corner
    • Protection Proponent
    • Army Chemical Review
    • Engineer Professional Bulletin
    • Military Police Professional Bulletin
  • U.S. Army Counterintelligence Command

Units / Tenants

  • U.S. Army Engineer School
  • U.S. Army CBRN School
  • U.S. Army Military Police School
  • 102nd Training Division
  • MSCoE Noncommissioned Officers Academy
  • 43rd AG Reception Battalion
  • 58th Transportation Battalion
  • 763D EOD
  • Homeland Defense Civil Support Office
  • Geospatial Enterprise Office
  • General Leonard Wood Community Hospital
  • U.S. Air Force
  • Marine Corps Detachment
  • Navy Detachment
  • U.S. Army Prime Power School

Search

Home U.S. Army home page
Army.mil
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood

Home of the Maneuver Support Center of Excellence.


NEW!   Check out the new NCO's Barracks Guidebook!
  1. Home
  2. Contact
  3. MSCoE Publications
  4. Protection Professional Bulletin
  5. The Inaugural Protection and Maneuver Support Senior Leader Forum

The Inaugural Protection and Maneuver Support Senior Leader Forum

Listen to This Article
Select 'Read Article Aloud' to begin.

The Inaugural Protection and Maneuver Support Senior Leader Forum

By Colonel Barrett K. Parker, Retired, and First Sergeant Michael A. Koren, Retired.

The inaugural Protection and Maneuver Support Senior Leader Forum, held 23 through 25 July 2024 at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, was a grandly lauded endeavor that inspired some of the most notable Army luminaries to travel—many for the first time—to one of the premier hunting, camping, and fishing areas of the Midwest to discuss recent evolutions and the future of the protection domain. Visitors to Fort Leonard Wood enjoyed the warm, sunny weather while they engaged in superb dialogue and observed well-planned and well-orchestrated demonstrations related to the most complex Army warfighting function.

The forum kicked off with several keynote speakers. Each speaker addressed the unique Army perspective on how protection must be synchronized in support of the Army of 2030 while the Army postures for 2040. The Chief of Staff of the Army, Sergeant Major of the Army, Commanding General of the United States Army Training and Doctrine Command, and Commanding General of the United States Army Combined Arms Center served as the esteemed members of the Army’s senior leader panel, held with standing room only in Lincoln Hall at the Ike Skelton Complex. While the panel members discussed a wide variety of diverse topics, two underlying themes emerged: The protection warfighting function is an integral part of the Army’s future fight, and protection must be on the minds of leaders at all echelons and components.

The first day of the forum culminated with Colonel Joseph E. Elsner, Training and Doctrine Command Proponent Office–Protection, comprehensively describing the event setting for the next day—a threat-informed, wet-gap crossing modified to fit the terrain at Training Area 250, where a live demonstration of the combined protection effects of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear; engineer; military police; explosive ordnance; fires; cyber; electronic warfare; air defense; and space and missile defense assets would be conducted. The results of protection warfighting function actions, activities, and tasks on a 2030 battlefield ensure that protected maneuver can be brought into focus for the Army.

After opening remarks on the second day, large, white buses transported anxious observer-passengers to a location about a kilometer away from the actual wet-gap crossing site. Over the next 3 hours, participants received a series of briefings, discussed displays, and attended presentations that demonstrated how various and diverse protection equities would be arrayed in support of a wet-gap crossing—but in a significantly compressed space. At the conclusion of these activities, participants had the opportunity to view a waterborne demonstration, in which an M-1135 Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Reconnaissance Vehicle was rafted to the far shore.

The afternoon session of the second day of the forum consisted of a roundtable discussion on protection integration, which was chaired by division and corps commanders. Again, despite the wide variety of presenter experiences, there were two overarching themes: The protection warfighting function is an integral part of the Army’s future fight, and leaders must be cognizant of protection capabilities at their echelons and components. The roundtable chairs held deliberate discussions and made strong points with regard to ensuring that allies and partners understand how the Army incorporates protection into operations.

During the afternoons of the first 2 days of the forum, the Protection and Maneuver Support Industry Exposition was held at Nutter Field House. Hosted by the Engineer, Military Police, and Chemical Corps Regimental Associations, the exposition consisted of vendor displays from a wide variety of industry partners; the displays filled the field house to capacity and occupied most of the sprawling parking lot.

The final half-day of the forum was focused on modernization and United States Army Maneuver Support Center of Excellence and science and technology initiatives.

What are the expectations for the future? In coordination with the other centers of excellence, the Maneuver Support Center of Excellence will continue to drive change and enhance understanding of the protection warfighting function throughout the next year. The Maneuver Support Center of Excellence will also continue to conduct annual protection senior leader forums to inform and better prepare leaders across the operational forces, centers of excellence, and partner nations to increase shared understanding relative to the protection enterprise. Planning for next year’s forum has already started, and the Maneuver Support Center of Excellence is excited to share what it comes up with next!

The Inaugural Protection and Maneuver Support Senior Leader Forum

By Colonel Barrett K. Parker (Retired) and First Sergeant Michael A. Koren (Retired)

The inaugural Protection and Maneuver Support Senior Leader Forum, held 23–25 July 2024 at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, was a grandly lauded endeavor that inspired some of the most notable Army luminaries to travel—many for the first time—to one of the premier hunting, camping, and fishing areas of the Midwest to discuss recent evolutions and the future of the protection domain. Visitors to Fort Leonard Wood enjoyed the warm, sunny weather while they engaged in superb dialogue and observed well-planned and well-orchestrated demonstrations related to the most complex Army warfighting function.

The forum kicked off with several keynote speakers. Each speaker addressed the unique Army perspective on how protection must be synchronized in support of the Army of 2030 while the Army postures for 2040. The Chief of Staff of the Army, Sergeant Major of the Army, Commanding General of the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Combined Arms Center served as the esteemed members of the Army’s senior leader panel, held with standing room only in Lincoln Hall at the Ike Skelton Complex. While the panel members discussed a wide variety of diverse topics, two underlying themes emerged: The protection warfighting function is an integral part of the Army’s future fight, and protection must be on the minds of leaders at all echelons and components.

The first day of the forum culminated with Colonel Joseph E. Elsner, Training and Doctrine Command Proponent Office (TPO)–Protection, comprehensively describing the event setting for the next day—a threat-informed, wet-gap crossing modified to fit the terrain at Training Area 250, where a live demonstration of the combined protection effects of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear; engineer; military police; explosive ordnance; fires; cyber; electronic warfare; air defense; and space and missile defense assets would be conducted. The results of protection warfighting function actions, activities, and tasks on a 2030 battlefield ensure that protected maneuver can be brought into focus for the Army.

After opening remarks on the second day, large, white buses transported anxious observer-passengers to a location about a kilometer away from the actual wet-gap crossing site. Over the next 3 hours, participants received a series of briefings, discussed displays, and attended presentations that demonstrated how various and diverse protection equities would be arrayed in support of a wet-gap crossing—but in a significantly compressed space. At the conclusion of these activities, participants had the opportunity to view a waterborne demonstration, in which an M-1135 Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Reconnaissance Vehicle was rafted to the far shore.

The afternoon session of the second day of the forum consisted of a roundtable discussion on protection integration, which was chaired by division and corps commanders. Again, despite the wide variety of presenter experiences, there were two overarching themes: The protection warfighting function is an integral part of the Army’s future fight, and leaders must be cognizant of protection capabilities at their echelons and components. The roundtable chairs held deliberate discussions and made strong points with regard to ensuring that allies and partners understand how the Army incorporates protection into operations.

During the afternoons of the first 2 days of the forum, the Protection and Maneuver Support Industry Exposition was held at Nutter Field House. Hosted by the Engineer, Military Police, and Chemical Corps Regimental Associations, the exposition consisted of vendor displays from a wide variety of industry partners; the displays filled the field house to capacity and occupied most of the sprawling parking lot.

The final half-day of the forum was focused on modernization and U.S. Army Maneuver Support Center of Excellence (MSCoE) and science and technology initiatives.

What are the expectations for the future? In coordination with the other centers of excellence, MSCoE will continue to drive change and enhance understanding of the protection warfighting function throughout the next year. MSCoE will also continue to conduct annual protection senior leader forums to inform and better prepare leaders across the operational forces, centers of excellence, and partner nations to increase shared understanding relative to the protection enterprise. Planning for next year’s forum has already started, and MSCoE is excited to share what it comes up with next!Protection Watermark Crest

About the Authors

Colonel Parker (Retired) is the deputy chief of TPO–Protection, Fielded Force Integration Directorate (FFID), MSCoE, Fort Leonard Wood. He holds a bachelor’s degree in earth science from Pennsylvania State University, University Park; a master’s degree in environmental management from Samford University, Homewood, Alabama; a master’s degree in engineering management from Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla; and a master’s degree in strategic studies from the U.S. Army War College, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. He retired as a colonel from the U.S. Army Reserve.

First Sergeant Koren (Retired) is the chief of the Training Development and Integration Branch, TPO–Protection, FFID, MSCoE. He holds a bachelor’s degree in history from Drury University, Springfield, Missouri; a master’s degree in homeland security from George Washington University, Washington, D.C.; and a doctorate of education from the University of Southern California, Los Angeles. He served 21 years as a military police Soldier and retired from the U.S. Army as a first sergeant.

Download Original PDF Document
Published November 23, 2024
Share this page:

Army.mil

Army.mil


Employment

FOIA

Terms of Use

Accessibility/Section 508

Ready Army


Need Help? Try Army A-Z

My Army Benefits

Warriors Wanted Videos

Page Last Modified: 10/15/26, 1:22 PM

Army CID Submit a Tip / Report a Crime Logo

ManeuverSptCtrOfExce_nobackground.fw.png

Fort Leonard Wood

 

Policies and Regulations

MSCoE MEO and Garrison EEO

SHARP

Provide Feedback

Webmaster

PRIVACY

 

 

Community Resource Guide

https://www.usainscom.army.mil/isalute/iSalute - Report suspicious activity

imcom.army.mil

U.S. ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND


"We Are the Army's Home"

FIND A GARRISON

Survivor Outreach Services | Total Army Sponsorship | Safety

Human Resources | Civilian Expeditionary Workforce

U.S. Army Environmental Command | Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy & Environment

Back to Top