Skip to content

Navigation Menu

About

  • Mission and Vision
  • Leadership
  • History
  • Fort Leonard Wood Historic Tour
  • FLW Command Policies and Memorandums of Instruction
  • Fort Leonard Wood Regulations
  • About the Region Video
  • Explore the FLW Region

My Fort Leonard Wood

Visitors Access
Training Information
Graduation Information
Newcomers Information
eGuidon News
Hunting and Fishing
Fort Leonard Wood MWR
Bruce C. Clarke Library
Sexual Harassment Assault Response Prevention (SHARP)
Military Equal Opportunity
Voter Assistance
Army Community Services
Army Emergency Relief (AER)

Contact

  • Crisis Phone Numbers
  • Phone Directory
  • Office of the Inspector General
  • MWR Calendar
  • Feedback (ICE)
  • Public Affairs Office
  • MSCoE Publications
    • Writer's Guide & Submission Guidelines
    • Protection Professional Bulletin
      • Friendly Force Information Requirements as Protection-Informed Decisions
      • CBRN Company Task Organization for Persistent and Nonpersistent Threat Environments
      • A Layered Approach to Active Protection
      • Targeted and Exposed: Why Command Post Survivability Demands a Paradigm Shift
      • 42nd Infantry Division Protection Cell: Breaking the Reactive Cycle
      • A New Horizon for Maneuver Support Experimentation: The Final MSPIX and a Vision for the Future
      • Commanders: A Deeper Understanding of the Protection Warfighting Function
      • Further Defining Protection Support Planning
      • Can't Measure a Negative: The Protection Warfighting Function and Large-Scale Combat Operations
      • Failure to Consider Protection in Large-Scale Combat Operations: The Siverskyi Donets River Crossing
      • Protection: The Australian Army Combat Engineer Regiment Approach
      • Fight to Protect the Force
      • Protection: The Fabric of the Warfighting Functions
      • Enabling Convergence: How Engineers Protect the Multidomain Battlespace
      • War-Gaming
      • Protection in the Modern Battlespace: A Conceptual Approach for Battalion and Brigade Staffs
      • Joint Protection Efforts
      • Protection in an Armored Division-The Iron Way
      • Maneuver Support Center of Excellence and Fort Leonard Wood Commanding General
      • Maneuver Support and Protection Integration Experiment 2024
      • Protective Fires
      • The Inaugural Protection and Maneuver Support Senior Leader Forum
      • Survivability: The Foundation of Protection
      • Aligning Protection in the Operations Process
      • Book Review: Next War: Reimagining How We Fight
      • 2025 Protection Warfighting Function Professional Media List
      • Impact of the 52d BEB Mounted CBRN R&S Platoon Throughout KRF-13
      • The Application of the U.S. Army RM Process is Broken
      • Prioritizing Protection: Creating Synchronized Success
      • 10 Tips for Improving Your Protection Working Group
      • Protection Integration in an Armored Corps Insights from WGFX 23-04
      • A Diverse Strategy for a Diverse WFF
      • ADP 3-37, Protection: An Update to the WFF
      • Protection Analysis
      • What is Protection in 2040?
      • The EOCOP and its Place in LSCO
      • The Rugged Brigade and DCRF 22: Preparing to Respond to CBRN Disasters
      • Operationalizing Risk Management for Division and Corps
      • Taming the Hydra: Working Toward an Integrated Protection Construct
      • The All-Domain Protection Story
      • The Protection Warfighting Function In Irregular Warfare
      • Multi-Domain Operations: The Latest Evolution of Operational Doctrine
      • EOD and LSCO in Doctrine
      • Where Did the IEDs Go? Thoughts on Strategic and Operational Rear Areas
      • MSSPIX 22
      • Integrating Protection Into Modern-Day Wargaming
      • CBOA 22
      • Modernization of the Protection WFF
      • You are not alone: How to engage your protection Warfighting Function Community
      • Changing Mindsets: The Necessity of Considering Protection First In future Conflicts with Peers
      • Demining in the DMZ
      • Protection Planning at Every Echelon
      • Paradigm Shift: Transforming the Protection WFF to Meet the New Peer Competitor in Multi-Domain Operations
      • Protection and the Change in the Character of War
      • Advising Foreign Security Force Engineers
      • Scaffolding the Future of Protection: Protection Training and Education
      • Power Projection Mission Assurance in the Homeland
      • Competing Through C-IED Fusion in the pacific: Developing Partners and Allies with Functional Area SFA
      • Modernizing the Forgotten Warfighting Function: Protection
      • Realizing All-Domain Protection
      • EOD in LSCO
      • The Character of Harms: Operational Challenges in Control
      • Multidomain Protection Operations in a Multicommand Environment
      • Protection Archives
    • Protection Proponent
    • Army Chemical Review
    • CBRN Commandants Corner
    • Engineer Professional Bulletin
    • Military Police Professional Bulletin
    • Military Police Commandants Corner
  • U.S. Army Counterintelligence Command

Units / Tenants

  • U.S. Army Engineer School
  • U.S. Army CBRN School
  • U.S. Army Military Police School
  • 102nd Training Division
  • MSCoE Noncommissioned Officer's Academy
  • 43rd AG Reception Battalion
  • 5th Engineer Battalion
  • 58th Transportation Battalion
  • 763D EOD
  • Homeland Defense Civil Support Office
  • Geospatial Enterprise Office
  • General Leonard Wood Army Community Hospital
  • U.S. Air Force
  • Marine Corps Detachment
  • Navy Detachment
  • U.S. Army Prime Power School

Search

Home U.S. Army home page
Army.mil
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood

Home of the Maneuver Support Center of Excellence.


  1. Home
  2. Contact
  3. MSCoE Publications
  4. Protection Professional Bulletin
  5. MSSPIX 22

MSSPIX 22

MSSPIX 22

By Captain Zachary L. Batton

The Maneuver Support Battle Laboratory, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, and the Sustainment Battle Laboratory, Fort Lee, Virginia, annually execute the Maneuver Support Sustainment and Protection Integration Experiment (MSSPIX) under the oversight of the U.S. Army Joint Modernization Command, Fort Bliss, Texas. MSSPIX is one of four Army focused warfighter experiments funded by the Futures and Concepts Center, U.S. Army Futures Command, Fort Eustis, Virginia; it focuses on sustainment- and protection-based capability gaps, using emerging prototype technologies and capabilities developed by government laboratories and private industry.

During the annual experiments, Soldiers have the opportunity to use prototype systems in an operationally relevant environment. In return, technology developers receive Soldier feedback and some insight into Army priorities. This year, MSSPIX 22 was executed at Fort Leonard Wood and Fort Lee from 2 to 17 May 2022. With the help of 27 Soldiers tasked from four U.S. Army Forces Command installations, the Maneuver Support Battle Laboratory assessed the potential for using emerging technologies to address existing capability gaps and to provide input for capability development documents. This article highlights some of the technologies that were assessed during MSSPIX 22 and describes the focus of each of those assessments.

A Soldier receives instruction on the Mobile-Acquisition Cue and Effector System.
A Soldier receives instruction on the Mobile-Acquisition Cue and Effector System.

The Mobile-Acquisition Cue and Effector System©, developed by Northup Grumman, is an air defense vehicle that is fitted with a 30-millimeter M230LF Bushmaster cannon, incorporated with an automated targeting platform. The Mobile-Acquisition Cue and Effector System can successfully detect, identify, track, and eliminate unmanned aircraft systems (UASs). The platform is designed to provide on-the-halt capability, nondedicated air defense, and ground detection to units on the move. During the MSSPIX 22 event, military police and infantry Soldiers were trained on the use of the targeting and detection system incorporated into the technology and multiple live-fire scenarios were conducted to demonstrate the capability of the system to engage fixed-wing and rotary-wing UASs.

The Anduril Lattice© family of systems was also tested during MSSPIX 22. It is unique in that it combines surveillance capabilities with an artificial-intelligence-enabled Lattice software platform. Radar and sensors, along with the artificial-intelligence-enabled software, presents prioritized threat alerts to Soldiers, reducing the cognitive load on operators while providing an autonomous reconnaissance capability via the use of a rotary-wing UAS platform. The advanced sensors can also be used to gather detailed targeting information about potential threats. The Lattice software is designed to elevate situational awareness and provide Soldiers with additional planning time to coordinate denial activities.

The Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Defense has developed CBRN sensors in robotic platform technology, which provides detection, identification, and mapping of weapons of mass destruction hazards via its modular detection payloads attached to a UAS. The software includes chemical plume prediction and radiation heat-mapping capabilities that help mitigate exposure risk to personnel and equipment by maximizing standoff distances during CBRN reconnaissance. During MSSPIX 22, CBRN Soldiers were trained on the detailed mission setup and deployment of the autonomous UAS platform and scenarios that included a live radiation source and a simulated chemical plume (which demonstrated the ability of the system to conduct CBRN reconnaissance at standoff) were conducted.

Training on an InstantEye UAS with attached payload.
Training on an InstantEye UAS with attached payload.

The InstantEye© UAS, developed by InstantEye Robotics, is a small, lightweight, autonomous UAS designed to be rapidly deployed by any Soldier to conduct tactical close-area reconnaissance or deploy light payloads. The compact InstantEye fits into a standard Army pack, which allows the Soldier to deploy it while on mission. During MSSPIX 22, the system was used by a mix of military police, engineer, and infantry Soldiers to demonstrate its minimal training burden and its reconnaissance capabilities against personnel, vehicles, and areas of interest under operational scenarios. The ability of the system to deploy a reconnaissance robot into a facility of interest was also demonstrated during MSSPIX 22.

Finally, during MSSPIX 22, the U.S. Army CBRN School, Fort Leonard Wood, assessed four different technologies designed to provide personnel-carried detection of chemical vapors and provide users with alerts of a suite of chemical agents at greater sensitivity and lower false-alarm rates than those of existing Army systems. These technologies, referred to as compact vapor chemical agent detectors, were developed by N5 Sensors©, GE Research©, Teledyne FLIR©, and Collins Aerospace©. The focus of the assessments was to determine the burden on the warfighter payload and any interference with Soldiers’ primary mission. All vendor-presented devices were compact and lightweight and could be strapped or clipped onto the Soldiers. CBRN and infantry Soldiers compared the variants of the compact vapor chemical agent detectors and provided feedback on the device interfaces, functional controls, and control limitations that could be assessed while in personal protective equipment.

The assessment of emerging prototype systems is an important component of the capability development process. Capability developers learn about the latest state-of-the-art advancements and how new technologies may be able to fill capability gaps in order to better define key performance parameters and system attributes, leading to more-refined requirements and improved capability development documents. At the same time, science and technology developers receive crucial feedback from military users, which helps ensure that the new systems are not only relevant but also operationally useful. Army focused warfighter experimentation events play a critical role in Army modernization by providing a learning venue where military problems and potential solutions in a multi-domain operations-relevant environment may be better understood.Protection Watermark Crest

About the Author

Captain Batton is the experimentation officer for the Maneuver Support Battle Laboratory, Fort Leonard Wood. He holds a bachelor’s degree in physical education from the University of North Carolina, Pembroke.

Download Original PDF Document
Published Annual Issue 2022
Share this page:

Army.mil

Army.mil


Employment

FOIA

Terms of Use

Accessibility/Section 508

Ready Army


Need Help? Try Army A-Z

My Army Benefits

Warriors Wanted Videos

Page Last Modified: 8/12/26, 2:31 PM

Army CID Submit a Tip / Report a Crime Logo

ManeuverSptCtrOfExce_nobackground.fw.png

Fort Leonard Wood

Victory Through Skill


Policies and Regulations

MSCoE MEO and Garrison EEO

SHARP

Provide Feedback

Webmaster

PRIVACY

 

 

Community Resource Guide

https://www.usainscom.army.mil/isalute/iSalute - Report suspicious activity

imcom.army.mil

U.S. ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND


"We Are the Army's Home"

FIND A GARRISON

Survivor Outreach Services | Total Army Sponsorship | Safety

Human Resources | Civilian Expeditionary Workforce

U.S. Army Environmental Command | Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy & Environment

Back to Top