Skip to content

Navigation Menu

About

  • Mission and Vision
  • Leadership
  • History
  • Fort Leonard Wood Historic Tour
  • FLW Command Policies and Memorandums of Instruction
  • Fort Leonard Wood Regulations
  • About the Region Video
  • Explore the FLW Region

My Fort Leonard Wood

Visitors Access
Training Information
Graduation Information
Newcomers Information
eGuidon News
Hunting and Fishing
Fort Leonard Wood MWR
Bruce C. Clarke Library
Sexual Harassment Assault Response Prevention (SHARP)
Military Equal Opportunity
Voter Assistance
Army Community Services
Army Emergency Relief (AER)

Contact

  • Crisis Phone Numbers
  • Phone Directory
  • Office of the Inspector General
  • MWR Calendar
  • Feedback (ICE)
  • Public Affairs Office
  • MSCoE Publications
    • Writer's Guide & Submission Guidelines
    • Protection Professional Bulletin
      • The Fight Behind the Fight: 55th MEB Prepares for Modern Battlefield
      • The Evolving Protection Against Hostile Drones
      • Friendly Force Information Requirements as Protection-Informed Decisions
      • CBRN Company Task Organization for Persistent and Nonpersistent Threat Environments
      • A Layered Approach to Active Protection
      • Targeted and Exposed: Why Command Post Survivability Demands a Paradigm Shift
      • 42nd Infantry Division Protection Cell: Breaking the Reactive Cycle
      • A New Horizon for Maneuver Support Experimentation: The Final MSPIX and a Vision for the Future
      • Commanders: A Deeper Understanding of the Protection Warfighting Function
      • Further Defining Protection Support Planning
      • Can't Measure a Negative: The Protection Warfighting Function and Large-Scale Combat Operations
      • Failure to Consider Protection in Large-Scale Combat Operations: The Siverskyi Donets River Crossing
      • Protection: The Australian Army Combat Engineer Regiment Approach
      • Fight to Protect the Force
      • Protection: The Fabric of the Warfighting Functions
      • Enabling Convergence: How Engineers Protect the Multidomain Battlespace
      • War-Gaming
      • Protection in the Modern Battlespace: A Conceptual Approach for Battalion and Brigade Staffs
      • Joint Protection Efforts
      • Protection in an Armored Division-The Iron Way
      • Maneuver Support Center of Excellence and Fort Leonard Wood Commanding General
      • Maneuver Support and Protection Integration Experiment 2024
      • Protective Fires
      • The Inaugural Protection and Maneuver Support Senior Leader Forum
      • Survivability: The Foundation of Protection
      • Aligning Protection in the Operations Process
      • Book Review: Next War: Reimagining How We Fight
      • 2025 Protection Warfighting Function Professional Media List
      • Impact of the 52d BEB Mounted CBRN R&S Platoon Throughout KRF-13
      • The Application of the U.S. Army RM Process is Broken
      • Prioritizing Protection: Creating Synchronized Success
      • 10 Tips for Improving Your Protection Working Group
      • Protection Integration in an Armored Corps Insights from WGFX 23-04
      • A Diverse Strategy for a Diverse WFF
      • ADP 3-37, Protection: An Update to the WFF
      • Protection Analysis
      • What is Protection in 2040?
      • The EOCOP and its Place in LSCO
      • The Rugged Brigade and DCRF 22: Preparing to Respond to CBRN Disasters
      • Operationalizing Risk Management for Division and Corps
      • Taming the Hydra: Working Toward an Integrated Protection Construct
      • The All-Domain Protection Story
      • The Protection Warfighting Function In Irregular Warfare
      • Multi-Domain Operations: The Latest Evolution of Operational Doctrine
      • EOD and LSCO in Doctrine
      • Where Did the IEDs Go? Thoughts on Strategic and Operational Rear Areas
      • MSSPIX 22
      • Integrating Protection Into Modern-Day Wargaming
      • CBOA 22
      • Modernization of the Protection WFF
      • You are not alone: How to engage your protection Warfighting Function Community
      • Changing Mindsets: The Necessity of Considering Protection First In future Conflicts with Peers
      • Demining in the DMZ
      • Protection Planning at Every Echelon
      • Paradigm Shift: Transforming the Protection WFF to Meet the New Peer Competitor in Multi-Domain Operations
      • Protection and the Change in the Character of War
      • Advising Foreign Security Force Engineers
      • Scaffolding the Future of Protection: Protection Training and Education
      • Power Projection Mission Assurance in the Homeland
      • Competing Through C-IED Fusion in the pacific: Developing Partners and Allies with Functional Area SFA
      • Modernizing the Forgotten Warfighting Function: Protection
      • Realizing All-Domain Protection
      • EOD in LSCO
      • The Character of Harms: Operational Challenges in Control
      • Multidomain Protection Operations in a Multicommand Environment
      • Protection Archives
      • Protection Doctrine Corner
    • Protection Proponent
    • Army Chemical Review
    • Engineer Professional Bulletin
    • Military Police Professional Bulletin
  • U.S. Army Counterintelligence Command

Units / Tenants

  • U.S. Army Engineer School
  • U.S. Army CBRN School
  • U.S. Army Military Police School
  • 102nd Training Division
  • MSCoE Noncommissioned Officers Academy
  • 43rd AG Reception Battalion
  • 58th Transportation Battalion
  • 763D EOD
  • Homeland Defense Civil Support Office
  • Geospatial Enterprise Office
  • General Leonard Wood Community Hospital
  • U.S. Air Force
  • Marine Corps Detachment
  • Navy Detachment
  • U.S. Army Prime Power School

Search

Home U.S. Army home page
Army.mil
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood

Home of the Maneuver Support Center of Excellence.


NEW!   Check out the new NCO's Barracks Guidebook!
  1. Home
  2. Contact
  3. MSCoE Publications
  4. Protection Professional Bulletin
  5. Demining in the DMZ

Demining in the DMZ

Demining in the DMZ

By Colonel John P. Lloyd and Major Mark S. Born

At 10:00 a.m. on 27 July 1953 in Panmunjom, Korea, the Korean War Armistice Agreement was signed under the authority of the Commander in Chief, United Nations Command (UNC); the Supreme Commander of the Korean People’s Army; and the commander of the Chinese People’s Volunteers.[1] The first article of the Armistice Agreement created a military demarcation line and the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ). Approximately 4 kilometers wide, the DMZ separates North and South Korea—from the Yellow Sea (on the west) to the Sea of Japan (on the east). The UNC retained administrative authority of the 2-kilometer strip of the DMZ south of the military demarcation line, and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) retained control of the 2-kilometer strip of the DMZ north of the military demarcation line. Although the armistice called for the retreat of all combat forces from the DMZ, continued skirmishes after 1953 served to transform the area into a fortified barrier running the width of the Korean peninsula.

Through manmade fortification, revegetation after massive bombing during the Korean War, and inclement weather that has reshaped the terrain, the DMZ has become a large obstacle belt, developed and modified for more than 67 years, creating significant safety hazards to demining. The area of the DMZ south of the military demarcation line comprises 100.3 million square meters and contains a significant number of landmines (estimated at more than 1 million) as well as a significant amount of unexploded ordnance. Beyond the sheer number of explosive devices present, three factors increase explosive-hazard risks in the DMZ—time, mine drift as (a result of weather), and a lack of detailed documentation on minefield locations.

Overview of the Panmunjom Declaration and the CMA

On 27 April 2018, an inter-Korean summit was conducted between President Moon Jae-in of the Republic of Korea (ROK) (representing South Korea) and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the DPRK (representing North Korea). The summit took place in the Joint Security Area (JSA) at the historic South Korean Panmunjom Peace House. The two leaders publicly declared a plan for the establishment of a “peace regime” for the Korean peninsula; the historic meeting resulted in signing the Panmunjom Declaration for Peace, Prosperity, and Reunification of the Korean peninsula.[2]

The Panmunjom Declaration paved the way for a second summit between the leaders in Pyongyang, North Korea, in September 2018. There, delegates from the two governments signed the “Agreement on the Implementation of the Historic Panmunjom Declaration in the Military Domain,” otherwise known as the Comprehensive Military Agreement (CMA), on 19 September 2018.[3] Among the provisions of the agreement is a call for the transformation of the DMZ into a peace zone and the establishment of consultation on military assurance measures for—

  • The mutual withdrawal of guard posts.
  • JSA demilitarization.
  • Inter-Korean joint remains recovery.

With the support of UNC, the ROK government has proceeded with its implementation of the CMA.

Vision

At the 74th Session of the United Nations (UN) General Assembly, on 18 October 2019, President Moon Jae-in proposed the idea of transforming the DMZ into an international peace zone to the UN and its member states. “The DMZ is the common heritage of humankind, and its value must be shared with the whole world,” said President Moon.[4] His words generated a sense of urgency among the ROK peace supporters as well as the momentum necessary to begin the historic process of demining within the DMZ for the first time since 1953. He also created an opportunity for global support, stating, “Cooperation with the international community, including the UN Mine Action Service, will not only guarantee the transparency and stability of demining operations, but also instantly turn the DMZ into an area of international cooperation.”[5]

Arrowhead Hill

Demining on Arrowhead Hill
Demining on Arrowhead Hill.

The location that was agreed upon by a trilateral body comprised of ROK, UNC, and DPRK officials for the construction of a connecting road for conducting mine clearance was Arrowhead Hill, also known as Hill 281. Arrowhead Hill, located in Cheorwon Valley, was a site of considerable fighting between UNC forces (namely, the United States, France, and South Korea), China, and DPRK during the Korean War. It is estimated that the north side suffered 6,700 losses, while the south side lost 14,332. Over 9 days of fighting, it is estimated that the U.S. Air Force dropped 2,700 bombs, China fired 55,000 shells, and South Korea fired 185,000 shells. In 2019, ROK military engineers located 455 mines and 5,754 unexploded ordnance items at Arrowhead Hill.

Recovery Operations

Area clearance operations
Area clearance operations.

On 1 October 2018, soldiers from the ROK and DPRK armies began clearing operations in both JSA and Arrowhead Hill, in accordance with the CMA. (According to ROK law, only the military is authorized to conduct demining operations.) In the JSA, both sides focused on clearing areas of potential mines and unexploded ordnance.

Although the CMA included a requirement for the verification of cleared areas, it did not specify the standard for clearance or who would conduct the verification. Due to the absence of agreed-upon demining standards between ROK and DPRK, comprehensive minefield documentation, mine action programs, and an organization that represented mine action within the international community, UN command engineers and U.S. Forces Korea, Camp Humphreys, South Korea, engineers agreed to support ROK mine action program development and to utilize the UN International Mine Action Standards (IMAS) as the foundation for mine action development.[6]

To achieve IMAS-compliant mine clearance, UNC enlisted the help of a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers quality control team from the Engineering Support Center, Huntsville, Alabama. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers provided on-the-job training for ROK engineers, monitored ROK quality control operations, supplied external quality assurance measures, and provided certification for surface area clearance.

Clearance of the north side of the JSA, administered by the DPRK, was never verified to the same IMAS. Verification (or lack thereof) proved extremely critical, as two low-metallic box antipersonnel mines were detonated on the DPRK side of the JSA following the claimed clearance of mine hazards. Luckily, there were no injuries in those cases; however, these incidents, coupled with continued UNC insistence on clearance to the IMAS, served to highlight the lack of documentation on exact mine placement.

Upon completion of the first demining season in 2018,[7] UNC learned multiple critical lessons on mine actions in Korea. The first lesson learned regarded the value of published National Mine Action Standards, which are standards that are developed by countries based on IMAS—but are more specific than IMAS. They also provide a cradle-to-grave process for demining, from planning to disposal to land turn-over. The next lesson learned focused on the development of an internationally recognized National Mine Action Authority[8] and a National Mine Action Center.[9] The creation of a National Mine Action Authority and National Mine Action Center established international legitimacy for countries’ mine action policies, procedures, and coordination with international governmental and nongovernmental organizations. A final lesson learned was that the U.S. military does not execute demining operations unless they are deemed operationally essential—which can lead to gaps in demining knowledge and experience. As a learning organization, it became critical for the UNC to understand this limitation and seek subject matter experts from the field.

UN command engineers and U.S. Forces Korea engineers focused on developing opportunities to increase knowledge, learn from international governmental/nongovernmental agencies, and provide a mine action plan with support and oversight from subject matter experts in the mine action field. These actions support the achievement of a safe, transparent, and effective South Korean mine action program. Successful mine action initiatives have built a foundation to ensure that, in the future, the DMZ can indeed be transformed into a peace zone, as envisioned in the CMA and in President Moon’s UN General Assembly speech.[10]

UN command engineer initiatives over the past year have included—

  • Hosting a UNC demining workshop.
  • Attending the National Directors of Mine Action Conference in Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Visiting national mine action centers.
  • Standing up a U.S./ROK/UNC demining steering committee.
  • Visiting nongovernmental mine action organizations.
  • Providing state engineers with mine action experience for the UNC staff.
  • Enforcing standards for demining operations in the DMZ.

Even as a small engineer staff, UNC engineers were able to use available resources to help transform national policies and standards, which resulted in a successful 2019 Korean DMZ demining season.

Conclusion

For the past 67 years, the DMZ has been one of the most densely mine-laden and dangerous areas in the world. The CMA created an opportunity to facilitate change in the DMZ and ignited a spark that initiated the historic acts of strategically removing combat-related obstacles and recovering the remains of fallen heroes. These small steps led to immense results.

Peace is a process. UNC engineers and the Multinational Demining Committee continue to work across multiple lines of effort to socialize with countries affiliated with UNC, to send subject matter experts to observe and participate in demining efforts, and to continue working closely with ROK on creating mine action policies in accordance with international standards. These efforts include upgrades in the latest mine and unexploded ordnance technological advances and creating partnership synergy with professionals in nongovernmental organizations. Lastly, and most importantly, UNC engineers contribute to reconciliation on the Korean peninsula through the removal of mines.Protection Watermark Crest

About the Authors

Colonel John P. Lloyd is the command engineer for U.S. Forces Korea. He is the chair of the Demining Committee for the UNC. He holds a master’s degree in strategic planning from National Defense University, Washington, D.C.

Major Mark S. Born is the command operations engineer for U.S. Forces Korea. He is also the UNC mine action officer and liaison with ROK engineers. He holds a master’s degree in geological engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology at Rolla.

Endnotes:

  1. Agreement Concerning a Military Armistice in Korea, UN, 27 July 1953, https://peacemaker.un.org/koreadprk-militaryarmistice53, accessed on 3 August 2020. ↩
  2. Letter Dated 6 September 2018 From the Representatives of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea to the United Nations Addressed to the Secretary-General, UN, 6 September 2018, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1640603?ln=en, accessed on 3 August 2020. ↩
  3. “Agreement on Implementation of the Historic Panmunjom Declaration in the Military Domain,” National Committee on North Korea, 18 September 2018, https://www.ncnk.org/sites/default/files/Agreement%20on%20the%20Implementation...pdf, accessed on 3 August 2020. ↩
  4. “Full Text of President Moon Jae-in’s Speech at the 74th UN General Assembly Session,” Yonhap News Agency, 25 September 2019, https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20190924010500315, accessed on 3 August 2020. ↩
  5. Ibid. ↩
  6. International Mine Action Standards, IMAS Organization, 2001, https://www.mineactionstandards.org/, accessed on 3 August 2020. ↩
  7. The demining season is determined by weather conditions that permit the activities necessary for removal of mines and unexploded ordnance. The length of the season depends on the location, but the season generally consists of warmer months with little precipitation, as lower temperatures can cause freezing and excess precipitation can cause unsafe conditions. ↩
  8. “Full Text of President Moon Jae-in’s Speech.” ↩
  9. “UN Officials Discuss Support for President Moon's Vision for DMZ Mine Removal,” Yonhap News Agency, 17 February 2020, https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20200217003600325, accessed on 3 August 2020. ↩
  10. “Full Text of President Moon Jae-in’s Speech.” ↩
Download Original PDF Document
Published 2022 Inaugural Issue
Share this page:

Army.mil

Army.mil


Employment

FOIA

Terms of Use

Accessibility/Section 508

Ready Army


Need Help? Try Army A-Z

My Army Benefits

Warriors Wanted Videos

Page Last Modified: 8/18/26, 12:46 PM

Army CID Submit a Tip / Report a Crime Logo

ManeuverSptCtrOfExce_nobackground.fw.png

Fort Leonard Wood

 

Policies and Regulations

MSCoE MEO and Garrison EEO

SHARP

Provide Feedback

Webmaster

PRIVACY

 

 

Community Resource Guide

https://www.usainscom.army.mil/isalute/iSalute - Report suspicious activity

imcom.army.mil

U.S. ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND


"We Are the Army's Home"

FIND A GARRISON

Survivor Outreach Services | Total Army Sponsorship | Safety

Human Resources | Civilian Expeditionary Workforce

U.S. Army Environmental Command | Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy & Environment

Back to Top