Skip to content

Navigation Menu

About

  • Mission and Vision
  • Leadership
  • History
  • Fort Leonard Wood Historic Tour
  • FLW Command Policies and Memorandums of Instruction
  • Fort Leonard Wood Regulations
  • About the Region Video
  • Explore the FLW Region

My Fort Leonard Wood

Visitors Access
Training Information
Graduation Information
Newcomers Information
eGuidon News
Hunting and Fishing
Fort Leonard Wood MWR
Bruce C. Clarke Library
Sexual Harassment Assault Response Prevention (SHARP)
Military Equal Opportunity
Voter Assistance
Army Community Services
Army Emergency Relief (AER)

Contact

  • Crisis Phone Numbers
  • Phone Directory
  • Office of the Inspector General
  • MWR Calendar
  • Feedback (ICE)
  • Public Affairs Office
  • MSCoE Publications
    • Writer's Guide & Submission Guidelines
    • Protection Professional Bulletin
      • Friendly Force Information Requirements as Protection-Informed Decisions
      • CBRN Company Task Organization for Persistent and Nonpersistent Threat Environments
      • A Layered Approach to Active Protection
      • Targeted and Exposed: Why Command Post Survivability Demands a Paradigm Shift
      • 42nd Infantry Division Protection Cell: Breaking the Reactive Cycle
      • A New Horizon for Maneuver Support Experimentation: The Final MSPIX and a Vision for the Future
      • Commanders: A Deeper Understanding of the Protection Warfighting Function
      • Further Defining Protection Support Planning
      • Can't Measure a Negative: The Protection Warfighting Function and Large-Scale Combat Operations
      • Failure to Consider Protection in Large-Scale Combat Operations: The Siverskyi Donets River Crossing
      • Protection: The Australian Army Combat Engineer Regiment Approach
      • Fight to Protect the Force
      • Protection: The Fabric of the Warfighting Functions
      • Enabling Convergence: How Engineers Protect the Multidomain Battlespace
      • War-Gaming
      • Protection in the Modern Battlespace: A Conceptual Approach for Battalion and Brigade Staffs
      • Joint Protection Efforts
      • Protection in an Armored Division-The Iron Way
      • Maneuver Support Center of Excellence and Fort Leonard Wood Commanding General
      • Maneuver Support and Protection Integration Experiment 2024
      • Protective Fires
      • The Inaugural Protection and Maneuver Support Senior Leader Forum
      • Survivability: The Foundation of Protection
      • Aligning Protection in the Operations Process
      • Book Review: Next War: Reimagining How We Fight
      • 2025 Protection Warfighting Function Professional Media List
      • Impact of the 52d BEB Mounted CBRN R&S Platoon Throughout KRF-13
      • The Application of the U.S. Army RM Process is Broken
      • Prioritizing Protection: Creating Synchronized Success
      • 10 Tips for Improving Your Protection Working Group
      • Protection Integration in an Armored Corps Insights from WGFX 23-04
      • A Diverse Strategy for a Diverse WFF
      • ADP 3-37, Protection: An Update to the WFF
      • Protection Analysis
      • What is Protection in 2040?
      • The EOCOP and its Place in LSCO
      • The Rugged Brigade and DCRF 22: Preparing to Respond to CBRN Disasters
      • Operationalizing Risk Management for Division and Corps
      • Taming the Hydra: Working Toward an Integrated Protection Construct
      • The All-Domain Protection Story
      • The Protection Warfighting Function In Irregular Warfare
      • Multi-Domain Operations: The Latest Evolution of Operational Doctrine
      • EOD and LSCO in Doctrine
      • Where Did the IEDs Go? Thoughts on Strategic and Operational Rear Areas
      • MSSPIX 22
      • Integrating Protection Into Modern-Day Wargaming
      • CBOA 22
      • Modernization of the Protection WFF
      • You are not alone: How to engage your protection Warfighting Function Community
      • Changing Mindsets: The Necessity of Considering Protection First In future Conflicts with Peers
      • Demining in the DMZ
      • Protection Planning at Every Echelon
      • Paradigm Shift: Transforming the Protection WFF to Meet the New Peer Competitor in Multi-Domain Operations
      • Protection and the Change in the Character of War
      • Advising Foreign Security Force Engineers
      • Scaffolding the Future of Protection: Protection Training and Education
      • Power Projection Mission Assurance in the Homeland
      • Competing Through C-IED Fusion in the pacific: Developing Partners and Allies with Functional Area SFA
      • Modernizing the Forgotten Warfighting Function: Protection
      • Realizing All-Domain Protection
      • EOD in LSCO
      • The Character of Harms: Operational Challenges in Control
      • Multidomain Protection Operations in a Multicommand Environment
      • Protection Archives
    • Protection Proponent
    • Army Chemical Review
    • CBRN Commandants Corner
    • Engineer Professional Bulletin
    • Military Police Professional Bulletin
    • Military Police Commandants Corner
  • U.S. Army Counterintelligence Command

Units / Tenants

  • U.S. Army Engineer School
  • U.S. Army CBRN School
  • U.S. Army Military Police School
  • 102nd Training Division
  • MSCoE Noncommissioned Officer's Academy
  • 43rd AG Reception Battalion
  • 5th Engineer Battalion
  • 58th Transportation Battalion
  • 763D EOD
  • Homeland Defense Civil Support Office
  • Geospatial Enterprise Office
  • General Leonard Wood Army Community Hospital
  • U.S. Air Force
  • Marine Corps Detachment
  • Navy Detachment
  • U.S. Army Prime Power School

Search

Home U.S. Army home page
Army.mil
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood

Home of the Maneuver Support Center of Excellence.


  1. Home
  2. Contact
  3. MSCoE Publications
  4. Protection Professional Bulletin
  5. CBOA 22

CBOA 22

Chemical Biological Operational Analysis (CBOA) 22

By Chief Warrant Officer Three Macio E. Brown

“Technology cannot advance without the vision of a better tomorrow”

— Chief Warrant Officer Three Macio E. Brown

The Chemical Biological Operational Analysis (CBOA) event, developed and executed by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), provides researchers an opportunity to elicit warfighter feedback during the technology development process of emerging chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) capabilities for use in a realistic operational environment.

CBOA 22 was held at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, in May 2022. In its role as the Joint Science and Technology Office (JSTO) for the Chemical and Biological Defense Program, Chemical and Biological Technologies Department, DTRA, is the Department of Defense hub for chemical and biological technical expertise. The JSTO, which leads the defense community in preparing for chemical and biological threats, identifies and provides cutting-edge technology solutions to protect the security of the American people while empowering warfighters to achieve their missions in dangerous environments. The JSTO is responsible not only for protecting against the known threats of today but also for anticipating the major threats of tomorrow. In addition, JSTO provides science and technology support to the Department of Defense, other government agencies, and the international community.

DTRA sponsored more than 300 U.S. government, academia, and industry representatives as participants for CBOA 22, which addressed military capability gaps and high-priority mission deficiencies. During the week-long event, new CBRN-related technologies were assessed by capturing user feedback from all branches of the U.S. armed forces. Technologies were rated at technology readiness levels ranging from three to eight, based on four mission areas corresponding to the CBRN core functions: assess, protect, mitigate, and integrate command and control management.

The assessment focused on the following characteristics of the technologies: performance, adaptability, ability to be integrated into the mission command common operating picture, digital security, environmental robustness, training burden, ease of use, task-load requirements for system operations, propensity for system malfunctions, routine maintenance burden, and logistical impacts. The event consisted of three lanes, which contained multiple operational scenarios to demonstrate the effectiveness of the technologies.

CBRN Protection 2030 and Beyond

According to Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 3-37, Protection, “Many state and nonstate actors (including terrorists and criminals) possess or have the capability to possess, develop, or proliferate [weapons of mass destruction] WMD. The most likely adversaries during large-scale ground combat have significant WMD capabilities and the doctrine to employ them during conventional operations. The training to conduct operations in a WMD environment is critical to operational success.”[1] In order to achieve freedom of action, increase lethality, and enable movement and maneuver in the execution of large-scale ground combat operations in the complex CBRN environment, the Army must aggressively develop future CBRN defense capabilities to outpace our adversaries.[2]

U.S. Army Futures Command (AFC) Pamphlet (Pam) 71-20-7, Army Futures Command Concept for Protection 2028, builds upon the ideas of the multi-domain operations concept and serves as the baseline for required CBRN protection capabilities to enable Army forces in multi-domain operations through CBRN reconnaissance and surveillance, integrated early warning, real-time understanding, inherent survivability, and mitigation of CBRN hazards.[3] The key to successful all-domain protection includes improvement of artificial intelligence and machine learning for CBRN detection and mitigation capabilities. CBOA 22 highlighted breakthrough scientific discoveries and technological innovations that support the central idea of the core CBRN competencies (assess, protect, and mitigate) and the integrating activity of hazard awareness and understanding in support of the United States Army Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear (CBRN) Science & Technology Strategy.[4] By employing capabilities that enable decision making and protect the force, commanders can sense, assess, understand, decide, and act faster and more effectively, thereby gaining an information advantage.

CBOA Technologies Overview

CBRN assessment capabilities enable commanders to understand the environment as early as possible so that they may make informed, risk-based decisions that protect the force while retaining freedom of action in a CBRN environment. The following assessment technologies were assessed during CBOA 22:

Figure 1. Pendar X10
Figure 1. Pendar X10
  • Dial-a-Threat Assay—a hand-held, unpowered, human-readable biological threat identifier.
  • Biological Automated Collector/Detector for Expeditionary Reconnaissance (BioACER©)—a fully automated biological collection and identification device that can be released from an unmanned arial system (UAS) for remote analysis over a plume.
  • Falcon 4G©—a 4th-generation laser-based CBRN standoff detector (which was used in a base defense scenario).
  • FentAlert©—an all-environments screening assay for pharmaceutical fentanyl-based agents.
  • Far-Forward Advanced Sequencing Technology—a technology used to identify DNA- or RNA-based organisms.
  • Hazardous-material small UAS—a UAS that is used to fly optimized patterns through hazardous areas, detecting, identifying, quantifying, and mapping hazardous data in real time, thereby enhancing situational awareness and improving decision quality.
  • MUSA P3I©—a semiautonomous quadrupedal robot with integrated chemical and radiological detection/identification instruments that can also take photographs in the hot zone and conduct most CBRN reconnaissance/sampling missions.
  • NuGBall©—a portable sensor network for real-time CBRN contamination mapping.
  • Pendar X10©—a handheld standoff Raman spectroscopy chemical identification system used to identify unknown materials (liquid, solid, gel) at a distance of 1 to 6 feet within a few seconds (Figure 1).
  • Raman spectrometer—a spectrometer used to identify collected particles.
  • Rigaku©—a portable handheld, dual-technology 1064 nanometer for the identification of chemicals and toxic industrial chemicals.

CBRN protection capabilities enable inherent survivability (individual and collective) in support of large-scale combat operations, without degradation or loss of combat effectiveness in a CBRN environment. The following protection technology was assessed during CBOA 22:

  • Second Skin©—a mask cover that is installed on a standard M50 mask to improve the protective garment hood and mask interface.

CBRN mitigation contributes to the negation of hazard effects by providing commanders the flexibility to make risk-based decisions about the mitigation of residual CBRN contamination without the reduction of combat power or unnecessary expenditure of time and resources. The following mitigation technology was assessed during CBOA 22:

  • Decontaminating skin soap—a soap that is used to rapidly decontaminate sensitive equipment, materials, and skin from chemical warfare agents, biological warfare agents, toxic industrial chemicals, toxic industrial materials, nontraditional agents, pharmaceutical-based agents, and other emerging threats.

Digital Battlespace Command and Control Management

Digital battlespace command and control management systems provide CBRN staffs with the information required for commanders to make decisions with enhanced situational awareness and understanding in a timelier manner. Digital battlespace command and control management tools allow CBRN staffs to receive large amounts of CBRN threat information and intelligence, conduct analysis, and develop trends related to enemy CBRN employment. Technology developers presented the following capabilities during CBOA 22:

  • CBRN Analysis Software—a commercial, off-the-shelf knowledge management application.
  • The Hazard Estimation and Assessment Toolkit—a next-generation CBRN hazard modeling application for web-based TAK and Windows© TAK platforms.
  • Multiintelligence-Enabled Discovery—artificial-intelligence, machine-learning algorithms that use Azure Cloud© and Azure Cognitive Services© to provide near-real-time processing of multiple types of raw, unformatted environmental and intelligence data to provide intelligence insight and information to decision makers.

Conclusion

CBOA forges the future of CBRN modernization by showcasing experimentation, demonstration, and capability development for the joint force. Commanders need the ability to see the adversary, deny it anonymity, counter specific strengths, achieve positions of advantage, and expand and exploit gained areas. Lieutenant General D. Scott McKean, director of the Futures and Concepts Center, Army Futures Command, Fort Eustis, Virginia, prefaced his CBOA 22 speech on AFC Pam 71-20-7 by stating, “Looking forward, the Army must develop capabilities that can support and integrate with our joint, interagency, interorganizational, and multinational partners to expand the protection capability, increase capacity in competition, and operate at scale in armed conflict.” This guidance exemplifies the Army commitment to protecting the force, improving survivability, and reestablishing the readiness of forces through the development of modernized capabilities.Protection Watermark Crest

About the Author

Chief Warrant Officer Three Macio E. Brown is a material development technician assigned to the Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction Branch, Requirements Determination Division, Futures and Concepts Center, Maneuver Support—Capabilities Development and Integration Directorate, Army Futures Command, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. He holds an associate of arts degree from Central Texas College and a project management professional certificate from the Project Management Institute.

Endnotes:

  1. ADP 3-37, Protection, 31 July 2019. ↩
  2. CBRN Operations Force Modernization Strategy, U.S. Army CBRN School, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, July 2018. ↩
  3. AFC Pam 71-20-7, Army Futures Command Concept for Protection 2028, 7 April 2021. ↩
  4. United States Army Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear (CBRN) Science & Technology Strategy, U.S. Army, 2022. ↩
Download Original PDF Document
Published Annual Issue 2022
Share this page:

Army.mil

Army.mil


Employment

FOIA

Terms of Use

Accessibility/Section 508

Ready Army


Need Help? Try Army A-Z

My Army Benefits

Warriors Wanted Videos

Page Last Modified: 8/12/26, 3:14 PM

Army CID Submit a Tip / Report a Crime Logo

ManeuverSptCtrOfExce_nobackground.fw.png

Fort Leonard Wood

Victory Through Skill


Policies and Regulations

MSCoE MEO and Garrison EEO

SHARP

Provide Feedback

Webmaster

PRIVACY

 

 

Community Resource Guide

https://www.usainscom.army.mil/isalute/iSalute - Report suspicious activity

imcom.army.mil

U.S. ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND


"We Are the Army's Home"

FIND A GARRISON

Survivor Outreach Services | Total Army Sponsorship | Safety

Human Resources | Civilian Expeditionary Workforce

U.S. Army Environmental Command | Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy & Environment

Back to Top