*This article was edited with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Final review and editing were conducted by authorized DoW personnel to ensure accuracy, clarity, and compliance with DoW policies and guidance.
*The contents of this article do not represent the official views of, nor are they endorsed by, the U.S. Army, the Department of War, or the U.S. government.![]()
Published 12/31/2025
By Chief Warrant Officer Three Kevin J. Fisher
The extreme cold is relentless. It saps strength from the strongest Soldiers and makes the human body run on overdrive to continue surviving. It hurts just to exist in places that make exposed skin feel like hot needles are being driven into the muscle. And to make it worse, our equipment feels the same effects.
The majority of our engineer equipment was designed to operate in various conditions; however, it can be expected that in large-scale combat operations (LSCO), we may find ourselves fighting in environments outside temperate conditions. Historically, the Engineer Regiment has found itself in near-polar conditions and has been forced to learn cold-region effects in combat. In the current strategic environment, it is becoming more apparent that some armed conflict will occur north of the Arctic Circle. It would benefit the Army if all theater engineer operations focused on extreme cold training. We do not want to suffer from extensive learning curves in the next LSCO battlefield.
Long start-up times and drastically shortened maintenance windows can directly decrease combat effectiveness. In the frequent and likely event of severe weather, combat operations will grind to a halt unless the force is specifically tailored for extreme cold environments. Another facet to consider is that polar logistics is an absolute nightmare; decentralized warfare will be exponentially important. We can see the historical significance in many examples, but the Battle of Attu is highly relevant.
In the Pacific Theater of World War II, the Japanese Empire invaded the American territory of Alaska by way of the Aleutian Islands. American forces deployed to prevent the Japanese from island hopping with little resistance from the Alaskan mainland. It is documented that the Japanese and American forces were ill-prepared for the extreme environment. The severe cold, constant precipitation, and isolation are credited with several suicides within the Japanese forces.1
The culminating battle across these islands took place on the island of Attu. The U.S. forces were unprepared for the climate; certain units were deployed with the expectation of operating in the tropical climate of the southern Pacific—only to find themselves in the harsh subarctic Aleutian Islands. The Battle of Attu became a grueling contest of endurance, testing which force could operate better in cold and wet climates. This contest came to a head when the U.S. Army Reserve engineers had established a foothold on the island with an overall objective of removing all remaining Japanese forces. However, a surprise early-morning bonzai charge by the enemy led to brutal hand-to-hand and bayonet combat behind the front lines.
A recurring phrase in these publications—"if engineer support is available."5—reveals there is a noticeable gap in engineering literature that specifically addresses operations in cold-weather environments. There are no engineer-focused procedural publications for cold regions. From a doctrinal viewpoint, the Army will learn these lessons on the ground.
1 History.com Editors. “Battle of Attu.” Accessed February 27, 2025.
https://www.history.com/articles/battle-of-attu
2 Ibid
3 Robinson, L. (2022, February 28). Looking back at McMurdo’s history. The Antarctic Sun Science
News. https://antarcticsun.usap.gov/features/4711/
4 Northern Warfare Training Center, Pamphlet 385-4. “Risk Management Guide for Cold Weather Operations.” 11th Airborne Division.
5 Ibid
6 Amundsen, R. “Roald Amundsen: My life as an Explorer.” Directed by [name], University Microfilms International, 1979.

