Skip to content

Navigation Menu

About

  • Mission and Vision
  • Leadership
  • History
  • Fort Leonard Wood Historic Tour
  • FLW Command Policies and Memorandums of Instruction
  • Fort Leonard Wood Regulations
  • About the Region Video
  • Explore the FLW Region

My Fort Leonard Wood

Visitors Access
Training Information
Graduation Information
Newcomers Information
eGuidon News
Hunting and Fishing
Fort Leonard Wood MWR
Bruce C. Clarke Library
Sexual Harassment Assault Response Prevention (SHARP)
Military Equal Opportunity
Voter Assistance
Army Community Services
Army Emergency Relief (AER)

Contact

  • Crisis Phone Numbers
  • Phone Directory
  • Office of the Inspector General
  • MWR Calendar
  • Feedback (ICE)
  • Public Affairs Office
  • MSCoE Publications
    • Writer's Guide & Submission Guidelines
    • Protection Professional Bulletin
    • Protection Proponent
    • Army Chemical Review
    • CBRN Commandants Corner
    • Engineer Professional Bulletin
      • 12G AIT Transformation to 12N ASI
      • Rethinking Survivability
      • Battlefield Makerspaces
      • Sustaining Division Engineer Battalions
      • Blast Overpressure: Risk Mitigation for Maximum Performance
      • Maintenance Moving Forward
      • 3D Printing in Multidomain Operations United States Army Engineer Regiment
      • Cold Region Engineer Operations: The Engineer Regiment Needs to Get Comfortable Being Cold
      • The Engineer Coordinator History and Usage
      • Security Engineer For 120A Warrant Officer Basic Course
      • South China Sea: The Need for Army Engineer Amphibious Training and Doctrine
      • Enhancing Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore Operations: Lessons From the Gaza Humanitarian Mission
      • Improving Protection Training: How to Prepare for the Next Conflict
      • Urban Combat and The Gaza Metro: Preparing for War in Modern Megacities
      • The Future of Engineers in the South China Sea
      • Brazilian Army Engineer Instruction Center
      • Regimental Command Sergeant Major
      • Regimental Command Warrant Officer
      • Commandant
      • The Use of ARRK to Develop a COP at AO Victory
      • Engineer Reconnaissance: Technical Skills in the Reconnaissance Fight
      • Junior Engineer Officers Need Better Training
      • The Bureaucratic Bind: How Current Administrative Requirements Hinder Warfighting
      • Open Data Sources in Support of Engineer Reconnaissance
      • Training Junior Engineer Officers: The Way Forward
      • What is HMI?
      • Incorporating LMs into TSOs
      • Engineers, Partnerships, and Recruitment
      • Engineers on the Peninsula: Experience and Legacy of the 52nd BEB During KRF-13
      • Condition Checks: Wet-Gap Crossings
      • Operations Turning Point
      • EAB Engineer Battalion Training at JRTC
      • Should Company Commanders Have Dedicated GIS Assets?
      • Engineer Lessons Learned from the War in Ukraine
      • Planning for Construction of the Perfect Castle
      • Lieutenant Development
      • Reflections from a Deputy District Commander
      • Port Damage Repair Using Army Organic Equipment to Test Developing Mission Sets
      • The Future Role of Engineer Reconnaissance in Large-Scale Combat Operations
      • Data-Driven Risk Management in USACE Construction Contracts
      • Engineer Archives
    • Engineer Commandants Corner
    • Military Police Professional Bulletin
    • Military Police Commandants Corner
  • U.S. Army Counterintelligence Command

Units / Tenants

  • U.S. Army Engineer School
  • U.S. Army CBRN School
  • U.S. Army Military Police School
  • 102nd Training Division
  • MSCoE Noncommissioned Officer's Academy
  • 43rd AG Reception Battalion
  • 5th Engineer Battalion
  • 58th Transportation Battalion
  • 763D EOD
  • Homeland Defense Civil Support Office
  • Geospatial Enterprise Office
  • General Leonard Wood Army Community Hospital
  • U.S. Air Force
  • Marine Corps Detachment
  • Navy Detachment
  • U.S. Army Prime Power School

Search

Home U.S. Army home page
Army.mil
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood
U.S. Army Fort Leonard Wood

Home of the Maneuver Support Center of Excellence.


  1. Home
  2. Contact
  3. MSCoE Publications
  4. Engineer Professional Bulletin
  5. Blast Overpressure: Risk Mitigation for Maximum Performance

Blast Overpressure: Risk Mitigation for Maximum Performance

Blast Overpressure

Risk Mitigation for Maximum Performance

By Colonel Jodie L. Kunkel

U.S. Soldier watches a 40-pound shaped charge detonation
U.S. Soldier watches a 40-pound shaped charge detonation during Operation Tiger Dawn at Camp Mackall, N.C., Oct. 6, 2025. The controlled blast conducted under strict safety protocols helps engineers validate breaching techniques and sustain the XVIII Airborne Corps’ readiness to project decisive combat power. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Nolan Brewer)

In 2024, the Department of War (DoW)—formerly the Department of Defense—and the Department of the Army published new requirements aimed at increasing awareness, improving understanding, and driving materiel solutions to reduce and monitor blast overpressure (BOP) effects on personnel. This guidance builds on the All Army Activities (ALARACT) published in 2022 and reflects the DoW and Army’s overarching strategy: mitigate BOP risk while preserving operational readiness.[1][2]

Figure 1. Typical Blast Wave
Figure 1. Typical Blast Wave

BOP is the sharp rise in atmospheric pressure produced by an explosive detonation or weapon firing, generating a shock wave that travels faster than the speed of sound. Figure 1 illustrates a typical pressure-versus-time curve of a typical blast wave at a singular point, showing an instantaneous rise in pressure (peak overpressure), followed by an exponential decay toward zero and a subsequent period of negative pressure (underpressure). Although not depicted, rarefaction (release) waves and reflective waves—created as the blast interacts with surrounding structures—are also present. Impulse, defined as force exerted over time, is measured across the duration of the blast event, while peak pressure represents the highest pressure recorded. Reflective waves vary based on the environment and can significantly influence the overall blast profile. While understanding blast-wave physics is essential for breaching and demolition operations, this article focuses on the health effects experienced by personnel within the blast radius.

Why does understanding the characteristics of the blast wave matter? Peak pressures above 4 pounds per square inch (PSI) can cause injury. For example, a pressure differential of approximately 5 PSI across the eardrum can result in rupture, and exposure to 15 PSI can lead to lung damage. Current research indicates that personnel should avoid any exposure exceeding 4 PSI. As PSI increases, so does the risk of brain injury, lung or kidney damage, and gastrointestinal disruption. Repeated exposure below the 4-PSI threshold—or exposure to any component of the blast wave—may also contribute to chronic health issues over time. These can include tinnitus, irritability, memory and concentration difficulties, and sleep disturbances (see Figure 2).

Figure 2

Such conditions are challenging to diagnose because their signs and symptoms overlap with those of other genetic or environmental factors (such as dementia or prolonged exposure to high-noise environments). Additionally, the medical and industrial hygiene communities still lack a definitive threshold at which symptoms begin to manifest. This uncertainty is a key driver behind the development of the Cognitive Monitoring Program (CMP) for BOP.

Cognitive Monitoring Program

The CMP is the Army’s prescribed method for tracking brain health. Cognitive testing began in 2007, initially focused on predeployment and postinjury assessments to address brain injuries associated with improvised explosive devices (IEDs) encountered during deployments. In June 2024, as part of the shift toward continuous monitoring across a Soldier’s career, the Army began establishing cognitive baselines for all new Soldiers at training installations. The current assessment tool is the Neurocognitive Assessment Tool (NCAT), similar to its predecessor the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM). Each individual’s baseline is unique, and comparisons with subsequent assessments help identify cognitive changes over time.

The August 8, 2024, DoD Policy Memorandum for Managing Brain Health Risks from Blast Overpressure identifies several occupational specialties at increased risk of BOP. These include Engineer–General Engineer Officer (12A) and Combat Engineer (12B); Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Officers and Specialists (74A/D); Military Police (31B); and Explosive Ordnance Disposal Officers and Technicians (89A/D) among others, including civilian equivalents. Soldiers and civilians in any military occupational specialty (MOS) who serve as instructors on BOP-producing weapon systems are also considered high-risk. Within the Army Engineer Regiment, Bridge Crewmembers (12Cs) and Quarry Specialists (12Gs) warrant inclusion due to their routine work with explosives.[3]

The memorandum also lists high-BOP-producing weapon systems, such as the M2A1 .50-caliber machine gun, the M136A1 anti-tank 4 (AT4), and various breaching explosives. Personnel assigned to these systems are likewise at increased risk. High-risk Soldiers must complete an annual cognitive reassessment, while all others are required to retest at least every three years. Similar to annual hearing evaluations, cognitive monitoring is only reported to medical providers when a deviation from a baseline is detected. Commanders can track their units’ cognitive assessments through the Medical Protection System (MEDPROS) Commander’s Portal under the NCAT indicator.[4][5]

Informational Graphic

In addition to ANAM testing, the Army is developing wearable blast sensors. U.S. Army Transformation and Training Command (T2COM), working in coordination with the functional communities, is refining the requirements for these sensors across the total Army. This effort, combined with ongoing market research and related initiatives, will help shape the next steps of the program. Once fielded, these wearables will provide critical blast-exposure data to Soldiers, commanders, and the medical community.

SUBJ/URGENT ALARACT 022/2022 – Breaching Blast Overpressure Exposure For Personnel Safety Message:

Recent medical and scientific studies have yielded dramatic insights into the effects of Blast Overpressure on physical and neurological health as well as combat efficiency. These studies indicate that current safety mitigation measures for explosive breaching as outlined in doctrine TM 3-34.82 are inadequate and expose the force to unnecessary risks...All breaching events using energetics will limit personnel single overpressure exposure to 3 PSI...During training operations and/or multiple exposures, it is recommended that Soldiers further reduce overpressure exposure to no more than 2 PSI.[7]

Leadership Responsibilities

Leaders are responsible for managing risk, identifying hazards, and implementing appropriate control measures—and BOP is no exception. Because BOP exposure often occurs at lower levels during routine training, it can become overlooked or unaddressed simply due to familiarity. In addition to existing mitigation measures, educating the force on BOP and its effects is the essential first step in reducing this risk.[6]

Demo Range Mitigations

Figure 3. Minimum Safe Distance K-Factors for Blast Overpressure
Figure 3. Minimum Safe Distance K-Factors for Blast Overpressure

To mitigate peak pressure during demolition training, apply the minimum safe-distance formula in Graphic Training Aid (GTA) 05-10-033 (March 2024), using a K-factor of 30 for training and 20 for combat. Establishing adequate standoff distance remains the most effective measure for reducing BOP risk. Personnel must wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), including a helmet and hearing protection. Helmet orientation matters: the crown should face the blast to help deflect the wave. Any other orientation can create reflective waves inside the helmet, increasing the risk of brain injury. Environmental factors—such as confined spaces (urban terrain) and overcast conditions—can amplify reflective waves. When these conditions are present, leaders should consider adjusting or shortening training to limit exposure.

BOP-Producing Weapon Ranges

When conducting ranges with high BOP-producing weapons, limit the number of personnel in proximity to the weapon, avoid firing more rounds than required for qualification (do not conduct a spendex, and adhere to the authorized round count for each operator), and ensure that all personnel wear appropriate PPE. Increase the use of simulators and training aids prior to live-fire execution. Employing suppressors can reduce BOP exposure. Additional engineering solutions are currently under development to further lower BOP levels for various weapon systems, and once validated, these updates will be incorporated into applicable technical manuals.

Exposed to BOP?

If you or a Soldier under your leadership is exposed to BOP, seek medical attention immediately. Early evaluation and adherence to medical guidance can help reduce long-term effects, and recovery outcomes improve when issues are identified promptly. If diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury, follow all prescribed protocols before returning to duty. Additional information is available at Health.mil - Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence. If you begin experiencing any signs or symptoms of low-level blast exposure, as shown in Figure 2, consult your healthcare provider. The Department of Veterans Affairs now offers benefits to support those with blast-related injuries.MSCoE Watermark Logo

About the Author

Colonel Kunkel was the director of the Counter Explosive Hazards Center at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. She holds a bachelor’s degree in history from Lewis University, Romeoville, Illinois, and a master’s degree in public administration from Webster University, Webster Grove, Missouri.

References:

  1. Department of Defense, Department of Defense Requirements for Managing Brain Health Risks from Blast Overpressure, memorandum for senior Pentagon leadership et al., signed by the Deputy Secretary of Defense, August 8, 2024, U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC, PDF. ↩
  2. Department of Defense, DOD Blast Overpressure Reference and Information Guide, October 1, 2024, Health.mil – Military Health System Publications, PDF, https://health.mil/reference-center/publications/2024/10/01/dod-blast-overpressure-guide. ↩
  3. Ibid. ↩
  4. Ibid. ↩
  5. U.S. Army, “DEVCOM Armaments Center Engineers Seek to Increase Soldier Safety by Reducing Blast Overpressure,” Army.mil, July 17, 2025, https://www.army.mil/article/287159/devcom_armaments_center_engineers_seek_to_increase_soldier_safety_by_reducing_blast_overpressure. ↩
  6. U.S. Department of Defense, Protecting Brain Health Crucial for Operational Effectiveness, by Terry J. Goodman, MHS Communications, Health.mil, June 6, 2025, https://health.mil/news/dvids-articles/2025/06/06/news499830?type=spotlight. ↩
  7. U.S. Army, ALARACT 022/2022: Breaching Blast Overpressure Exposure for Personnel Safety Message, All Army Activities Message, Headquarters, Department of the Army, R 312013Z Mar 22, Army Publishing Directorate. ↩

Disclaimer 1: The contents of this article do not represent the official views of, nor are they endorsed by, the U.S. Army, the Department of War (DoW), or the U.S. Government.

Disclaimer 2: This article was edited with the assistance of AI tools, and subsequently reviewed and edited by relevant Department of War (DoW) personnel to ensure accuracy, clarity, and compliance with DoW policies and guidance.

Download Original PDF Document
Published January 28, 2026
Share this page:

Army.mil

Army.mil


Employment

FOIA

Terms of Use

Accessibility/Section 508

Ready Army


Need Help? Try Army A-Z

My Army Benefits

Warriors Wanted Videos

Page Last Modified: 7/8/26, 4:00 PM

ManeuverSptCtrOfExce_nobackground.fw.png

Fort Leonard Wood

Victory Through Skill


Policies and Regulations

MSCoE MEO and Garrison EEO

SHARP

Provide Feedback

Webmaster

PRIVACY

 

 

Community Resource Guide

iSalute - Report suspicious activity

imcom.army.mil

U.S. ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND


"We Are the Army's Home"

FIND A GARRISON

Survivor Outreach Services | Total Army Sponsorship | Safety

Human Resources | Civilian Expeditionary Workforce

U.S. Army Environmental Command | Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy & Environment

Back to Top