U.S. Army Garrison Hawaii hosts this webpage as a means of making information that the Army knows about depleted uranium on the Army's training ranges in Hawaii readily available to the public. We hope the information contained herein will help address the public's questions and concerns about DU.
The information provided is a compilation of data from the Department of Defense Health Affairs, Center for Disease Control, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Office of Public Health and Environmental Hazards, and Department of Veterans Affairs.
About Depleted Uranium
Depleted uranium, or DU, is a processed form of uranium. Uranium is a weakly radioactive heavy metal that occurs naturally in the environment. Rocks, soil, surface, water, air, plants, and animals all contain varying amounts of uranium. Because it is found everywhere on earth, we eat, drink and breathe a small amount every day. People have been mining uranium and using it in various applications for over 60 years, so there is a great deal of information available on uranium.
DU is the uranium left over from the process that enriches uranium for commercial and military uses. Enrichment is a process where a portion of the most radioactive forms of uranium are removed from naturally occurring uranium. DU is nearly twice as dense as lead, with 40% less radioactivity than natural uranium.
Under certain circumstances and at very high temperatures, DU can aerosolize. Research by military and non-military agencies confirm that this does not occur during brush fires. Re-suspension is primarily due to particle size rather than particle density or chemical form. We believe that the primary reason for immobilization is due to the large particle size of the uranium and the fact that the uranium primarily exists as large metal fragments. Among other factors, the soil types on Hawaii’s ranges also serve to limit DU migration from the impact area. Although it is highly unlikely that DU will move off the impact area due to military live-fire training, air monitoring and sampling will be conducted to ensure that migration is not occurring.
Hawaii has played a vital role in our national defense since 1913. During World War II, the military conducted extensive training to prepare our Nation's forces for combat and to protect Hawaii from outside attacks. This role continues today. Key to meeting this national defense role has been the military's conduct of live-fire training and testing with military munitions. Between 1960 and 1968, the military used the M101 spotting round in training. The M101 was a small (about 8 inches in length and 1-inch diameter) low speed projectile weighing about one pound and containing about 6.7 ounces of depleted uranium (DU) alloy. Unlike modern DU kinetic penetrators that are designed to defeat armor and may generate a cloud of DU dust upon impact, the M101 spotting round was used to identify the flight path of the Davy Crockett warhead. Use of the M101 would have deposited DU in large fragments.
In August 2005, while conducting range clearance activities to modernize ranges at Schofield Barracks, an Army contractor discovered 15 tail assemblies from the M101 spotting round, a component of the Davy Crockett weapon system.
By early 2006, a scoping survey confirmed the presence of DU fragments from the M101 on a portion of Schofield Barracks’ impact area. After confirming the presence of DU, the Army disclosed that information to the public.
The Davy Crockett was the name given to the M28 and M29 series of recoilless guns. This weapon system was produced from 1960 until 1968 and was used in training until 1968. Although the Davy Crockett could use several types of munitions, the munition of interest is the M101 spotting round that contained depleted uranium (DU). Unlike modern munitions that use DU penetrators to defeat enemy armor, the DU in the M101 was used to provide weight sufficient for the spotting round to mimic the trajectory of the Davy Crockett’s nuclear warhead. The M101 was a small (about 8 inches in length and 1-inch diameter), low- speed projectile that contained 6.7 ounces of a DU-alloy.
When the Davy Crockett was used, it was a classified weapon system and information concerning its deployment to Schofield and associated training activities was closely guarded.
Some speculate that DU used in penetrators is linked to Gulf War illnesses; however, medical screening and tests do not support this speculation. Studies concerning the health effects of DU can be found the Information Resources page.
The Army is committed to transparency on environmental issues and will provide information it discovers about the presence of DU on its ranges in Hawaii to the State of Hawaii, Department of Health, federal regulators and the public as it becomes available.
What is DU Used For?
DU is currently used in commercial and military applications that require the use of a very dense material. Commercial applications include: ballast and counterweights in airplanes and ships, radiation shielding and collimation in medicine, radiation therapy and industry.
DU is currently used by the armed forces as armor to protect Army tanks, and as penetrators in military munitions to destroy enemy armored vehicles.
DU’s ability to protect our Soldiers is unsurpassed. First, DU provides protection for the Abrams tank and its crew against enemy anti-tank munitions. DU armor is designed to cause rounds to function prematurely or bounce off the exterior of a tank. Second, when used in armor-piercing projectiles, DU provides unmatched capability to engage and penetrate enemy armor at distances out of the range of the enemy’s weapons systems.
Should I Be Concerned?
No. There is no imminent or immediate threat to human health from the DU present on Hawaii’s ranges, and the Army is working in concert with state and federal agencies to thoroughly assess the risk and determine the actions required to address the DU present on Hawaii’s ranges.
The Army takes very seriously all issues and public concerns arising from DU. The community’s health and safety, on post and off, is the top priority. As such, the Army is taking appropriate, proactive measures to assess the overall situation and to develop a comprehensive, transparent, full-disclosure strategy. This principled approach relies on federal and international scientific methods and protocols in consultation with state and federal officials who are responsible for ensuring public health and safety.
Based on data gathered and careful analysis of the current situation, there is no immediate or imminent health risk to people who work at Schofield Barracks or Pohakuloa Training Area (PTA) or live in communities adjacent to these military facilities from the DU present in the impact areas. A comprehensive risk assessment will be completed in 2008.
Any DU residue present is limited to impact areas well within the perimeter of operational ranges. These areas are not publicly accessible. Very few range and safety personnel access the impact areas of our operational ranges. Those people that work in these areas are trained to recognize potential hazards associated with military munitions.
The migration of DU off the military installation is highly unlikely. Studies have shown that DU transport is limited and that it is unlikely to move from the range under most conditions. Studies also have shown that the DU fragment size and the environmental conditions at the ranges in Hawaii serve to minimize the potential for migration, including by air. The Army will, however, monitor these ranges to determine whether migration occurs. The results of the monitoring efforts will be provided to the state and federal agency partners for review.
Studies conducted by numerous non-military agencies, including the World Health Organization and the Department of Health and Human Services, have not found credible evidence linking DU to radiation-induced illnesses. These studies can be found on the Information Resources page.
The Army has been working closely with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to address the presence of DU on Hawaii's ranges. The NRC is also involved in review and oversight of the survey process. If appropriate, the NRC will license ranges for long-term environmental monitoring or clean up.
The State of Hawaii Department of Health and Department of Defense are collaborating on this process. Additionally, the Army is in constant communication and coordination with a wide array of DOD and non-DOD federal agencies. Together we will plan the “way-ahead” to address the DU present on Schofield Barracks and PTA. The organizations and some of the individuals involved in this effort are identified on the Partners page.
The Army's two-month survey at Schofield Barracks and PTA covered more than 425 acres. More than 1,400 air, vegetation, and soil samples were collected and sent to independent labs on the mainland for testing and analysis. The results of the Schofield Barracks Human Health Risk Assessment are available here. The results of the PTA Human Health Risk Assessment are available here.
Current Response Initiatives
M101 tail assemblies that were found at Schofield Barracks were removed and properly disposed of following Department of Transportation and NRC requirements. The Army, in coordination with the state and federal agencies, has completed a comprehensive survey of Schofield Barracks' range and defined the areas where DU is present. It has also, based on a preliminary survey and an archival research, defines all the areas at PTA where the M101 is believed to have been used. The Army is working with the NRC in close coordination with the state of Hawaii’s Department of Health to obtain the NRC license required given the presence of DU on its ranges.
The Army conducted air and water sampling at Schofield Barracks to determine if DU is migrating off the range. The sampling to date does not indicate the presence of DU in air or water samples. The Army will continue this sampling for the foreseeable future.
At the direction of Mr. Tad Davis, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health, the Army initiated the following four-point plan to assure transparency:
- All information obtained will be provided in a timely manner to the Hawaii State Department of Health.
- The state will be a partner in the planning and execution of a survey and monitoring efforts to address Makua Military Reservation, Pohakuloa Training Area and Schofield Barracks.
- The state will be a partner in the planning and execution of mutually agreed upon response actions.
- The Army will provide any necessary training to state participants.
The Army is committed to providing information on the Hawaii DU efforts to the public. This website is an important step in providing the public a readily accessible source for information.
Documents are listed in the order released.
- Final Radiation Monitoring Report Including Appendices (May 2018)
Summary of Results for Summer, Fall, and Winter
2017 Sampling Events
- Final Site-Specific Environmental Radiation Monitoring Plan (September 2016)
Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii Annex 17
- Insights in Public Health: The Facts about Depleted Uranium in Hawaii (November 2013)
Hawaii Journal of Medicine & Public Health: Volume 72, No. 11, p. 404
- The Facts about Depleted Uranium in Hawaii (August 2013)
Hawaii State Department of Health Fact Sheet
- Estimating Public Exposure to Airborne DU Outside PTA (June 22, 2011)
- Final PTA Depleted Uranium Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment (June 2010)
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (March 2010)
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (February 2010)
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (January 2010)
- Comment on the Capstone DU Aerosol Characterization and Risk Assessment Study (January 2010)
Health Physics: Volume 98 - Issue 1 - p 77
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (December 2009)
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (November 2009)
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (October 2009)
- Final Saddle Road Uranium Soils Investigation and Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment , Ke’amuku Parcel, South Kohala District (October 2009)
Report presents the results of a surface soil sampling event, a source determination and background evaluation and Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment.
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (September 2009)
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (August 2009)
- Makua Flyover Tech Final (July 24, 2009)
Aerial radiation, visual surveys walkover surveys and soil sampling of potential Davy Crocket impact areas at MMR.
- PTA Flyover Tech Report Final (July 24, 2009)
Aerial radiation, visual surveys walkover surveys and soil sampling of potential Davy Crocket impact areas at PTA.
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (July 2009)
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (June 2009)
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (May 2009)
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (April 2009)
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (March 2009)
- Report to Congress on Study of Health Effects of Exposure to DU (Feb. 4, 2009)
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, Section 716
- Hawaii Island Depleted Uranium Update (Feb. 3, 2009)
- Airborne Uranium Monitoring Summary Report at PTA (February 2009)
- Health Consultation: Depleted Uraninum at Hawaiian Military Sites (Aug. 25, 2008)
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) health consultation
- Waiki'i Ranch Report (July 10, 2008)
- Hawaii County Council Information Briefing (May 20, 2008)
DU information briefing
- Characterization Report for Schofield Barracks Davy Crockett Impact Area (April 2008)
- Schofield Barracks Impact Range Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment for Residual Depleted Uranium (April 2008)
- Schofield Barracks Firing Range Monitoring of Air Quality During Burning of Vegetation (April 2008)
- DU Scoping Investigations for Makua Military Reservation, Pohakuloa Training Area and Schofield Barracks Impact Area (April 2008)
- DU, Natural Uranium and Other Naturally Occurring Radioactive Elements in Hawaiian Environments (May 30, 2008)
Report for the National Defense Center for Environmental Excellence
- PTA Air Sample Analysis Tech Memo (May 2008)
- Epidemiologic Studies of Veterans Exposed to DU (2008)
Institute of Medicine evaluating the feasibility and design of an epidemiologic study that would assess health outcomes of exposure to depleted uranium.
- ASR Davey Crockett Hawaii (May 2007)
Data and information concerning the use of the Davy Crockett Light Weapon M28 on ranges at Schofield Barracks and associated training areas.
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- State of Hawaii's Department of Health Resources
- The Facts about Depleted Uranium in Hawaii. Public interest and concern is sometimes raised about the medical effects of exposure to depleted uranium. or DU. In this fact sheet, the Department of Health will discuss these concerns and explain why DU does not pose a significant health threat to the people of Hawaii.
- Department of Defense Resources
- Health Physics Society
- The Health Physics Society ⚠ is a nonprofit scientific professional organization whose mission is to promote the practice of radiation safety. In recent years, depleted uranium, or DU, is frequently noted in the news because of extensive use on the battlefields of Kosovo and Iraq. There is a great deal of concern about the medical effects of DU exposure. In this fact sheet, the Society explains the significance and validity of these concerns.
- World Health Organization
- The World Health Organization is the directing and coordinating authority for health within the United Nations system. It is responsible for providing leadership on global health matters, shaping the health research agenda, setting norms and standards, articulating evidence-based policy options, providing technical support to countries and monitoring and assessing health trends.
Frequenly Asked Questions
The following are questions and comments received by members of the public and the Army's responses to them. This section will be updated as appropriate. If you have a question that is not answered below, please contact us (see ways to contact us on the right).
Why are residents and visitors alike "kept in the dark" about military contamination in Hawaii?
The Army takes very seriously all issues and public concerns arising from DU. The community’s health, on post and off, is a top priority. The Army, in consultation with the state and federal officials, is taking appropriate, proactive measures to assess the overall situation and to develop a comprehensive, transparent, full-disclosure strategy to ensure public safety.
This website, our Information Booklet on DU, and numerous meetings with state and federal agencies and the public are examples of our efforts to inform the public.
The Army asserted that no DU weapons were used at Schofield. Why did you mislead the public?
The Army did not intend to mislead the public and responded based on the best information it had at the time. Until the discovery of fragments from the 1960’s era M101 spotting round in 2005, Army officials were not aware of such use.
Over 40 years ago, the Davy Crockett was a Department of Defense classified weapons system. Information about where the Davy Crockett was deployed and what units received training on this weapon was closely guarded. When the Davy Crockett was removed from the inventory, local records were also removed and stored in various locations on the mainland.
After the discovery at Schofield, the Army conducted research to determine the extent to which the Davy Crockett was used in Hawaii. The Army determined that portions of PTA and Makua could have been used for this training. This is why these installations are included in the reviews and assessments.
Spent DU spotting rounds were found at Schofield Barracks, (An Army base and live-fire training range on O’ahu), in August 2005. Was this discovery first disclosed by the military through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) initiated by concerned residen
No. The Army disclosed the discovery of the presence of DU in its impact area in a January 2006 press release following soil sampling and scientific confirmation. Although some may believe there was a delay in public notification, the Army believes it needed to confirm its initial findings prior to disclosing the discovery.
Does the Stryker fire weapons in Hawaii that contain DU?
No. Army and DOD regulations prohibit the use of munitions that contain DU in training. As such, Stryker vehicles training in Hawaii are prohibited from such use.
Will Strykers drive in areas contaminated with DU?
No. DU is confined to Schofield Barracks’ and PTA’s impact areas. DU has not been detected outside of the impact areas at either Schofield Barracks or Pohakuloa. Due to a safety hazard from unexploded ordnance, personnel and vehicles, including Strykers conducting training, are prohibited from entering the impact area.
Is the Army still using DU munitions in Hawaii?
No, Army and DOD Regulations strictly prohibit the use of military munitions that contain DU in training.
Are Army units, training at Schofield Barracks or PTA, being contaminated with DU and spreading that through the community?
No. DU is confined to the impact area at PTA and Schofield Barracks and has not been detected outside of the impact area. The impact area has restricted access and is not open for use by Soldiers or the public.
The real danger with DU comes with the vaporized or aerosolized form, which occurs on impact. Is that occurring on our training ranges?
Because Army and DOD Regulations prohibit use of DU in training, the Army does not use munitions that contain DU on its training ranges in Hawaii. Separately, the Army has conducted testing during prescribed burns and there was no indication that DU was present in the air. The M101 spotting rounds used in Hawaii were not designed like today’s DU penetrators as kinetic energy munitions, but rather to mimic the flight trajectory of the Davy Crockett’s nuclear warhead and mark the point of impact. Unlike modern DU penetrators that upon impact with a target—depending on the munitions, the nature of the impact, and the target—may generate a cloud of DU dust, use of the M101 spotting round would have resulted in the 6.7 ounces of DU used in the round being deposited in large fragments in the immediate vicinity of the point of impact without burning.
Can DU, once vaporized, spread off the range? Could fire aerosolize the DU?
DU only aerosolizes at a very high temperature, much higher than temperatures produced by brush fires. No DU was detected in air during prescribed burns. DU has not been detected outside of the impact areas at Schofield Barracks or PTA, and it is highly unlikely that it will migrate off the impact area. Nevertheless, the Army will monitor these ranges for DU releases for some time into the future.
The report on sampling during the prescribed burn is provided under the Reports tab.
How much DU gets kicked into the air when they do live-fire exercises?
Very little DU is believed to be kicked up because vehicles and personnel, which are the most likely to disturb the DU, are restricted from entering impact areas where the DU is present. Live-fire impacts may further fragment M101 remnants, but would be unlikely to cause particles small enough to be transported outside the impact areas. Ongoing air testing will provide information to determine whether DU dust is transported outside the impact areas. Results of the air testing will be made available once obtained.
Community concerns regarding aerosolized DU included, “Was DU present in the smoke that drifted over downwind communities during this
To date, the air samples taken during prescribed range burns have not detected DU. Sampling protocols were vetted with the State Department of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency. A formal report that provides the data collected is available under the Reports tab.
Residents of South Kona said they used a Geiger counter to test on April 21, 2007, downwind from Pohakuloa, 35 miles from the range, and got a radiation reading of 93 counts per minute. A typical radiation background reading is up to 20 counts per minute
Residents used a Gamma Scout Geiger counter that can only detect DU at a distance of a few inches. Out of concern for the public, the State’s 93rd Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team was deployed to take additional radiation readings using the proper counters and procedures. State Adjutant General/Hawaii Army National Guard, Major General Bob Lee, stated, “I’m in charge of homeland security, and so it’s of enormous concern to me; they have the best equipment on the Islands and could find nothing above background radiation.”
Can the Gamma Scout Geiger counter detect DU?
Yes, but you must be within a few inches of an item to detect DU. Therefore, it would not be able to detect DU in the air miles from the DU. Additionally, meters respond to other radiation sources and not solely DU. It would not be possible to distinguish the radiation source without analysis.
What is the half-life and why does it matter?
Half-life is the time it takes for one-half of the atoms of a radioactive element to change (transform) into another element. Uranium 238, the primary component of DU, has a half-life of over 4.5 billion years. Half-life is important because it tells us how long an element will be around and is an indicator of how radioactive it is. DU has a relatively long half-life which means it will exist for a relatively long period of time, but it also means it does not produce as many radioactive emissions in a period of time that a person might be exposed to it.
Are there elevated radiation readings around our ranges?
No. Neither DU nor elevated radiation readings have been detected outside of the impact areas at either Schofield Barracks or Pohakuloa.
The public is concerned about contamination of streams that feed into Kaukonahua stream.
Air and water samples were collected at Schofield Barracks to determine if DU particles are being transported off the ranges. Surface water samples collected to date have not detected DU. This sampling will continue for the foreseeable future. The results of past sampling are contained in the under the Reports tab.
Will the Army test employees exposed to DU on our ranges?
Yes, if the employees have the potential to have ingested or inhaled DU. The potential for exposure is very small since DU is confined to Schofield Barracks’ and PTA’s impact areas and access to the impact areas is generally prohibited due to the hazard from unexploded ordnance. DU has not been detected outside either of these impact areas.
Local groups want the military to be more forthcoming and to cooperate in testing. They say at the very least the state should be involved. Has the state participated?
The Army is working in full partnership and disclosure with representatives from the State Department of Health and other state and federal agencies. These agencies include, but are not limited to, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Environmental Protection Agency and various Army commands and agencies.
Community members have stated,
The State Department of Health is working with the State of Pennsylvania, Bureau of Radiation Protection, and Department of Environmental Protection to provide analysis and oversight. Further, the State of Hawaii Department of Health officials can and are encouraged to observe sampling and independently analyze the collected samples to ensure accuracy and independence of data and conclusions.
What kind of isotopes make up the DU we have encountered?
DU encountered in Hawaii is comprised of the same three uranium isotopes in natural uranium found in the earth: U-238, U-235, and U-234. DU is formed as a byproduct of the enrichment of natural uranium. The enrichment process removes the lighter isotopes from natural uranium, so that the remaining material is "depleted" in U-235 content and is called DU. The lighter isotopes, U-235 and U-234, are more radioactive than U-238. Because the remaining material contains more U-238 and less of the more radioactive isotopes, DU is 40 percent less radioactive than the naturally occurring uranium that is found in the food, water, and air that you consume daily. Kinetic penetrators containing DU are not and may not be used in Hawaii.
PTA is an anti-armor, live-fire training range. Live-fire is using real and lethal ammunition.
Army and DoD policy prohibit the use of military munitions that contain DU in training.
The community is concerned that DU from live-fire training drifts on the trade winds over our communities. Can DU from the M101 contaminate our water and soil?
It is highly unlikely that DU will migrate out of the impact area. DU is approximately twice as dense as lead. Studies have determined that DU tends to remain in the immediate area that it was deposited. Re-suspension is primarily due to particle size rather than particle density or chemical form. We believe that the primary reason for immobilization is due to the large particle size of the uranium and the fact that the uranium primarily exists as large metal fragments. DU has not been detected outside of the impact areas at either Schofield Barracks or Pohakuloa. The Army is committed to long-term monitoring of the air and water to screen for DU.
The military’s talking points are about the solid form of DU, the military never addresses Hawai’i residents’ concerns about the ballistic form of DU.
To the best of our knowledge, DU has never been used in ballistic form (i.e., kinetic penetrators) in Hawaii. The DU fragments discovered were from the tail assemblies of the M101 spotting rounds used with the Davy Crockett weapons system. Unlike modern DU penetrators that upon impact with a target—depending on the munitions, the nature of the impact, and the target—may generate a cloud of DU dust, use of the M101 spotting round would have resulted in the 6.7 ounces of DU being deposited in large fragments without burning. The DU used in the tail assemblies was ballast and not ballistic material.
Isn't uranium highly radioactive and therefore dangerous to humans and the environment?
Uranium is a naturally occurring metal that is mildly radioactive. Humans and animals have always ingested particles of this naturally occurring substance from the air, water and soil. Studies conducted through 2005 consistently indicate that the health risks associated with DU exposures are low.
There have been 16 epidemiological studies of some 30,000 workers in U.S. radiation industries. Some of these workers, particularly in the early days of the industry, had very significant exposures to uranium particles. According to scientists in the field, there have been no recorded cases of illness among these workers as a result of their exposure to uranium. Natural uranium and DU have not been linked to any health effects.
Can exposure to DU cause cancer?
Cancer rates in almost 19,000 highly exposed uranium industry workers who worked at Oak Ridge National Laboratory between 1943 and 1947 have been examined, with no excess cancer rates observed through 1974. Other epidemiological studies of lung cancer in uranium mill and metal processing plant workers have either found no excess cancer rates or attributed them to known carcinogens, such as radon, rather than uranium.
Can DU cause kidney damage?
Recent studies have examined possible health effects from exposure to DU from chemical heavy-metal effects, unrelated to radiation. The best understood of these potential health risks, as determined by high-dose animal experiments, is kidney damage. These studies indicate, however, that acute kidney damage would require an amount of uranium in the human body at levels much higher than those of soldiers who were inside vehicles actually struck by DU munitions.
Was there any monitoring for airborne DU or other radioactivity during or after impacts from several 2,000-pound bombs dropped on Oct. 23, 2007?
The Army did not monitor these events.
Were the bombs an attempt to destroy the spotting rounds, cluster bombs, and/or anything else on the ground?
No. The impact area used for bombing is not the area where DU is known or suspected to be present.
Did the bombing violate Army Regulation 700-48?
No, we are in compliance with all regulatory guidance.
Is there any use of cluster bombs containing DU at Pohakuloa and/or Makua (past, present and/or planned use)?
After checking with Department of the Army staff, we found no evidence to indicate that cluster bombs containing DU were ever used on Hawaii’s ranges, and the Army has no plans to use munitions that contain DU in Hawaii.
Will State personnel be allowed on federal property to check for DU or other radiation and/or to monitor Army testing?
Yes, the State of Hawaii’s Department of Health and Department of Defense have partnered with the Army and are fully engaged in a cooperative and open process to address this issue. Nevertheless, each of these entities may independently pursue parallel initiatives that meet their respective mission needs. To allow our leaders to make informed decisions based on best possible science, we actively seek advice and the recommendations from a broad range of agencies.
Explain why a 2000 search found no records about DU, but a later records search did. Did the Army conceal the presence of DU in Hawaii because it is, or was, classified information?
The Army did not intentionally conceal its past use of DU in Hawaii. At the time, we made a good faith effort to determine the facts by searching local records from all Military Services in Hawaii. Our focus, however, was on modern kinetic munitions that contain DU penetrators. The Davy Crocket was a classified weapon system, that actually used munitions containing DU, and trained in Hawaii in the early 1960s. We had no contemporary experience with this weapon system. Until we discovered DU on a Schofield Barracks’ range during range clearance activities in 2005, we had no local knowledge that the M101 spotting round had been fired in Hawaii.