IR.pngThe Fort Moore Internal Review (IR) office serves as the Commander's principal advisor for internal audits. IR is an independent and objective review and analysis activity within the command designed to add value and improve command or supported activity operations. IR helps the Commander accomplish mission objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and command oversight. IR engagements are based on statutory, regulatory, and command requirements; valid requests for services; and needs developed from risk assessments. The IR office provides the following services:

  • Audits
    • Performance Audits
    • Financial Audits
    • Attestation Engagements
  • Audit Follow-Up
  • Liaison with External Agencies
  • Army Audit Sustainment
  • Antideficiency Act (ADA) Violation Investigations

Mission

The IR mission is to serve as a team of highly professional auditors who are catalysts for risk assessment and management controls, providing:

  • Innovative internal audit services to leadership that are objective, relevant and timely.
  • Best value while fostering an environment of continuous improvement.

Vision

The IR vision is to be the premier source to decision makers for professional, objective, timely, relevant information and strategies for achieving continuous organizational improvement and accountability.

Our Services

The installation Internal Review office's mission is to serve as a team of highly professional auditors who are catalysts for risk assessment and management controls, providing:

  • Innovative internal audit services to leadership that are objective, relevant and timely.
  • Best value while fostering an environment of continuous improvement.

We serve as the commander's principal advisor for internal audits. IR is an independent and objective review and analysis activity within the command designed to add value and improve command or supported activity operations.

We also help the commander accomplish mission objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and command oversight. IR engagements are based on statutory, regulatory, and command requirements; valid requests for services; and needs developed from risk assessments

What Internal Review Can Do for You?

  • Review the reliability and integrity of financial operating information and the means used to identify, measure, classify and report such information.
  • Ascertain whether financial and operating records and reports contain accurate, reliable, timely, complete, and useful information.
  • Ascertain whether controls over record keeping and reporting are adequate and effective.

  • Review the systems established to ensure compliance with policies, plans, procedures, laws and regulations that could have a significant impact on operations and reports, and determine whether the organization is in compliance.
  • Determine whether the systems are adequate and effective and whether the activities audited are complying with the appropriate requirements.

  • Verify the existence of assets.
  • Test the controls in place that safeguard assets from various types of losses, such as those resulting from theft, fire, improper or illegal activities, and exposure to the elements.

IR can verify that activities:

  • Established operating standards for measuring economy and efficiency.
  • Met established operating standards.
  • Identified, analyzed, and communicated deviations from operating standards to those responsible for corrective action.
  • Implemented corrective actions.
  • Analyzed policies and procedures to reduce underutilized facilities, nonproductive work, procedures that are not cost effective, overstaffing and understaffing, and unneeded or costly procurements.

  • Review operations and programs to ascertain whether results are consistent with established objectives and goals and whether officials carried out the operations or programs as planned.
  • Determine whether officials achieved the desired results or benefits and whether the entity has considered alternatives that might yield desired results at a lower cost.